Path: csiph.com!xmission!news.alt.net!not-for-mail From: owl Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy Subject: Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 21:39:29 +0000 (UTC) Organization: O.W.L. Lines: 30 Message-ID: References: <826aeead-7c89-43a3-8151-2de262f49138@googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: boom.rooftop.invalid Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.advocacy:355168 Sandman wrote: > In article , owl wrote: > >> > > Alan Bundis: >> > > 3. fretwizzer@gmail = Steve Carroll = fretwizzen@gmail and that >> > > is a fact. >> > >> > DFS: >> > Evidence of this 'fact'? >> >> Alan Bundis == meat, et al. > > Well, in that it's one of Snit sock puppets, yes. But Snit has several ways of > trying to hide his tracks. One is using TOR accounts. He uses this to post as > meat, tmelmosfire and the forged Steve Carroll account. But he also uses a > Powerhouse VPN to post with these throwaway names. He has used it to forge > flatfish, and also used names like Edward Stansfield, Big Fish in a Small > Crotch, Barry H, mike antipasto, anonymous, Nobody, Somebody, Crusher, Omar, > Richard King, Richard Bone and Miguel Lubricant to name a few. They have all > used the same IP from a Powerhouse VPN. > Those nicks you list at the end are definitely all the same person, and all post from one of the Yokubaitis company networks. But I have yet to see any link to Snit from any of them, and I have looked pretty hard to find one. Thelma is definitely a Snit sock, as are the Carroll fakes, IMO; but the others look more like flatfish or somebody channelling flatfish. I know that sometimes they "come to Snit's rescue", but when that happens, the post reeks with sarcasm.