Path: csiph.com!xmission!news.alt.net!not-for-mail
From: owl <owl@rooftop.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2015 19:32:53 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: O.W.L.
Lines: 38
Message-ID: <sh3fa0.a@rooftop.invalid>
References: <sreig83.ajig3@rooftop.invalid>   <n18viv$v1u$2@dont-emt@g.me> <D25Dsanity.com> <n190nkallopinginsanity.com> <n190nk$2is$3@dont-email.me> <D25D558C.627B9%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <n193i2$a62$1@dont-email.me> <D25D6371.627F8%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <n197bb$ds5$3@dont-email.me> <D25D7317.6282B%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <n1ad9u$fb1$2@dont-email.me> <D25E3C4E.62921%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <sfheja80.aae@rooftop.invalid> <D25E53B9.6295E%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: boom.rooftop.invalid
User-Agent: tin/2.2.1-20140504 ("Tober an Righ") (UNIX) (Linux/3.16.0-4-amd64 (x86_64))
Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.advocacy:330716

Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> On 11/3/15, 10:59 AM, in article sfheja80.aae@rooftop.invalid, "owl"
> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote:
> 
>>>> I find it striking how the "things that Infowars make up" end up
>>>> appearing on "reputable news sources" much later and only after it is
>>>> too late to stop them from happening. In the years that I've been
>>>> following them, they have been shown to be a lot more accurate and a lot
>>>> faster at reporting what's going on in the world. I will _always_ trust
>>>> an independent source over a corporate-sponsored brainwashing source
>>>> like what you rely on.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> Infowars repeatedly makes idiotic predictions. Here, in literally seconds of
>>> searching: <https://youtu.be/5NH5b20QZmg>.
>>> 
>>> It is a farce site, as realistic as the Onion.
>>> 
>> At least he bothers to make predictions, unlike the cowardly Evolutionists
>> who apparently don't have enough faith in their own "science" to take a guess
>> at what we will evolve into, even with 100% knowledge of conditions that might
>> give rise to changes.
> 
> You keep pushing the claim that evolutionary science makes no predictions
> and that its key prediction should be about what humans are evolving into.
> 
> That is just beyond ignorant. It proves you know NOTHING of the science...
> and is really all that needs to be known when you speak on the topic. You
> are unbelievably ignorant about it.
> 
> I sincerely hope you are just trolling and not as ignorant as you portray
> yourself. Remember, I already pointed you to a search to find specific
> predictions from evolutionary science. If you are truly as ignorant as you
> claim you are so by choice.
> 

So Evolution Theory fails at its most basic task.  Got it.