Path: csiph.com!xmission!news.alt.net!not-for-mail
From: owl <owl@rooftop.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: OT: While we fight over if Muslims or Christians are more evil...
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 03:23:16 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: O.W.L.
Lines: 46
Message-ID: <sdfa0fa.ef@rooftop.invalid>
References: <D266829F.63587%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <srhuf903.a03@rooftop.invalid> <n1vm19$fbs$1@news.albasani.net> <slrnn49mp6.jqf.jedi@nomad.mishnet> <fsahue0.a3@rooftop.invalid> <D26A8413.63B28%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <fdsj390a3.f@rooftop.invalid> <D26A8F05.63B58%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <fhau30a.a3@rooftop.invalid> <D26A983C.63B7F%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <rufds0.3rfa@rooftop.invalid> <D26AA143.63BAC%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: boom.rooftop.invalid
User-Agent: tin/2.2.1-20140504 ("Tober an Righ") (UNIX) (Linux/3.16.0-4-amd64 (x86_64))
Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.advocacy:332818

Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> On 11/12/15, 7:49 PM, in article rufds0.3rfa@rooftop.invalid, "owl"
> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote:
> 
>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>> On 11/12/15, 7:21 PM, in article fhau30a.a3@rooftop.invalid, "owl"
>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote:
>>> 
>>> ...
>>>>>>> You continue to be a bigot even after being told how offensive your
>>>>>>> bigotry
>>>>>>> is. You also have no right to not be offended: remember, the X for
            ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 _                   
| |__   ___ _ __ ___ 
| '_ \ / _ \ '__/ _ \
| | | |  __/ | |  __/
|_| |_|\___|_|  \___|
                     

>>>>>>> "Christ"
>>>>>>> has been used for a long time and by Christians. Stop whining about being
>>>>>>> persecuted.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Do blacks have a right not to be offended by the term "nigger"?  Or jews
>>>>>> the term "kike"?  Or Mexicans the term "wetback"?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Of course they do.
>>>> 
>>>> Why do they have the right not to be offended by a derogatory term, but
>>>> Christians don't have the same right?  Oh, I know, because in this new
>>>> world it's OK to persecute Christians.
>>> 
>>> Who said you did not have a right to be offended
>> 
>> You did.
> 
> But, let me guess, in an unquotable way, right?
> 

Unbelievable.  Look up, you idiot.  On this very post.
Snit:
<quote>
You also have no right to not be offended
</quote>