Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: vallor Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy Subject: Re: Kilowatts Date: 15 Jan 2025 17:07:43 GMT Lines: 43 Message-ID: References: <181a03da127b916c$17153$2732928$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com> <181a940f7adb322d$2009$2484$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com> <181aa2e783f6507c$101945$292657$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com> <4-udnW4MKdqYXBr6nZ2dnZfqnPGdnZ2d@giganews.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net g/Ayn0GcXpiD8n9fgY9H2gYkasQpEhZS+ULmEGGegih/Vo3YP8 Cancel-Lock: sha1:V2udYuj7PzZTkr3na3CZZ0DXV7s= sha256:SDh/q1hrv1iFGC3+sJZawNbEX707/ar6QVqvLoJOnKA= X-Face: +McU)#<-H?9lTb(Th!zR`EpVrp<0)1p5CmPu.kOscy8LRp_\u`:tW;dxPo./(fCl CaKku`)]}.V/"6rISCIDP` User-Agent: Pan/0.161 (Hmm2; c45f6052; Linux-6.12.9) Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.advocacy:684086 On 15 Jan 2025 16:38:52 GMT, vallor wrote in : > On Wed, 15 Jan 2025 16:26:51 +0000, Farley Flud wrote > in : > >> On 15 Jan 2025 14:22:29 GMT, vallor wrote: >> >> >>> Is this a dipole? >>> >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhombic_antenna >>> >>> >> Yes, it is. But a dummy like you could never tell. >> >> A Rhombic is merely 2 V-antennas connected end-to-end and a V-antenna >> is ... guess what ... a dipole. >> >> Give it up, loser. You haven't a leg to stand on. > > If -- as you claim -- every antenna is a "dipole", then what use is > there in the term? > > I think this is another of your sophomoric semantics arguments. > > So...is this a dipole? > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monopole_antenna Feeb did the snip-and-snark again! So according to Feeb, a monopole antenna is a dipole antenna. Glad that's all cleared up. Sigmonster for Feeb again: -- -v System76 Thelio Mega v1.1 x86_64 NVIDIA RTX 3090 Ti OS: Linux 6.12.9 Release: Mint 21.3 Mem: 258G "It seems to me that your antenna doesn't bring in too many stations anymore."