Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: rbowman <bowman@montana.com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: MacOS Sequoia vs. Linux Mint
Date: 14 Dec 2024 19:57:07 GMT
Lines: 11
Message-ID: <ls668jFprrqU6@mid.individual.net>
References: <ls32rcFprp3U1@mid.individual.net> <vjisol$3na5k$2@dont-email.me> <ls4k73Fig06U1@mid.individual.net> <Jxf7P.4523$EYNf.4309@fx11.iad> <vjkatj$28k0$5@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net DowrlZ/rOB4Y0AiOGOdX1gXS90tAUdDApkt/XUOYTT6o5yO595
Cancel-Lock: sha1:SV22povRfgulP1WpxCnNvpVMjjg= sha256:0cM7dkGuBWSQGvdZ8AEzpXeS7fcMWOR8xCo5YQzVG3I=
User-Agent: Pan/0.149 (Bellevue; 4c157ba)
Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.advocacy:680217

On Sat, 14 Dec 2024 16:14:43 -0000 (UTC), RonB wrote:

> There's no real comparison. The way Windows updates simply sucks. Maybe
> some day Microsoft will figure out how to do it right. But there's
> reasons why Linux can update WITHOUT rebooting and Windows can't.
> Windows is an inferior OS.

In all fairness my Fedora box is using an older kernel that what was 
downloaded because I haven't rebooted in a month. The good part is since I 
doubt there is any advantage for me with the new kernel I don't have to 
reboot and the other applications are updated correctly.