Path: csiph.com!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder3.hal-mli.net!news.alt.net!not-for-mail From: owl Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy Subject: Re: Is Hadron another homosexual like snit Michael Glasser? Date: Mon, 5 May 2014 05:14:51 +0000 (UTC) Organization: OK by me, so long as it doesn't get out of hand Lines: 86 Message-ID: References: <23c1b078-8703-456e-958e-f56a03edbcd1@googlegroups.com> <1fxf1jbgspeab$.xuobhx2cl96z$.dlg@40tude.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: boom.rooftop.invalid User-Agent: tin/1.9.2-20070201 ("Dalaruan") (UNIX) (Linux/2.6.24-32-generic (i686)) Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.advocacy:241955 Snit wrote: > On 5/4/14, 9:19 AM, in article NemdnZNck_sw9fvOnZ2dnUVZ_vednZ2d@bresnan.com, > "GreyCloud" wrote: > >> On 5/4/2014 6:49 AM, flatfish+++ wrote: >>> On Sun, 4 May 2014 14:42:59 +0200, Melzzzzz wrote: >>> >>>> On Sun, 4 May 2014 08:34:22 -0400 >>>> flatfish+++ wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Sun, 4 May 2014 04:08:22 -0700 (PDT), Steve Carroll wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> He certainly gets his feathers ruffled when snit gets attacked. >>>>>> Sounds like Hadron has a lot more in common with snit than extreme >>>>>> stupidity. Both are bone smokers. >>>>> >>>>> You truly are insane. >>>>> Why not give it a rest already? >>>>> You pollute this group far more than snit ever has. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Real Steve writes rarely. This one is impostor >>>> that spams this group. >>> >>> I don't know who is who anymore. >>> It's turned into a complete zoo. >>> >> Treat all Steves as snit. Snit talks a lot to himself, as he did in >> CSMA. That way you won't have to deal with all of his split personalities. >> > Baseless accusation. > Baseless? Prove it's baseless. > But even for me this has become tedious and boring. You and other morons are > just making accusations to get me to respond with a request for support > which you, I, and everyone knows you have none. You know you are wrong. You > know you have nothing to back your claims. You know you are lying. Do I > expect you to admit to it? Of course not! > Snit is now a wannabe cop hoping to get people to admit to things that are not true. > Even on topics other than your attacks, do you *really* believe NASA is > denying man-made global climate change? Unlikely - you *did*, but you are > not so stupid as to not figure out you are wrong. But you will never admit > it. > Prove man is responsible for *any* climate change. > Is Silver Slimer too stupid to realize he cannot defend his accusations? No. > Is he too stupid to realize he could not refute the NRA video. Unlikely. > Will he ever admit to these things - of course not. > The NRA did not produce that retarded video. You should refer to it as "the retarded video with that gay yuppie ranting about the NRA." > Is FlatFish so stupid as to really think I posted as Onion Knight or use > socks in general. No, I do not think so. But we will never see an admission > of this. Never. > An admission of what? Your brain appears to be scattered. > I keep pretending there is a chance that you will be honest - but it is a > game. You know you will not be. I know you will not be. And, heck, if I am > wrong and you decide to be honest it will not be because I asked you: one. > more. time. > Prove anyone has been "dishonest." > I have asked you guys to be reasonable dozens if not hundreds of times. You > refuse. So be it. As I said, even for me this has gotten old: you will > *never* support your claims nor admit to your lies... and my asking you to > do so will not encourage you to. > Prove that they will *never* support their claims. Prove that anyone is lying about you. These things you cannot do.