Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!us.feeder.erje.net!news.alt.net!not-for-mail From: owl Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy Subject: Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 05:28:29 +0000 (UTC) Organization: ok by me, so long as it doesn't get out of hand Lines: 17 Message-ID: References: <12bc1335-eac1-40bb-be99-bc8c1fa52159@googlegroups.com> <66c4cf86-c6e4-4598-b24c-454d0dc3a337@googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: boom.rooftop.invalid User-Agent: tin/1.4-19991113 ("No Labels") (UNIX) (Linux/2.6.38-16-generic (x86_64)) Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.advocacy:266760 Steve Carroll wrote: > On Sunday, November 9, 2014 9:35:58 PM UTC-7, owl wrote: >> Steve Carroll wrote: >> > On Sunday, November 9, 2014 6:50:46 PM UTC-7, owl wrote: >> >> > LOL! The word "item" is not a "typo" for a "feature of an item, no matter how high you are, liar. >> >> LOL! Of course it's a typo you dumb bitch. > An uneducated, idiotic liar is calling me names... whatever will I do? LOL! I'm educated enough to be able to follow context and discern between typos and errors in reasoning. You, on the other hand, despite your superior alien intellect, continue your idiotic foam-out that Snit was somehow wrong to disagree with the absurd idea that a set must contain all the features of any of its subsets.