Path: csiph.com!xmission!news.alt.net!not-for-mail
From: "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: Snit is a RACIST
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 21:10:31 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: O.W.L.
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <fhjgu00a3.r@perch.invalid>
References: <fhjadfo3.38p8@perch.invalid>   <D3E47195.7A15D%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <hgjdsau83.aiu@perch.invalid> <D3E4798E.7A18D%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <fhgvcmksdif83.s@perch.invalid> <43d212ed-508b-46f2-a8b3-513dc845eb50@googlegroups.com> <fhjgds03.aoo3@perch.invalid> <12ef9717-4392-41af-a2a8-fb60e05a4c40@googlegroups.com> <fhgue803qta.ug@perch.invalid> <D3E4A0BE.7A21B%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <ahjfu4003.fa@perch.invalid> <D3E4A53A.7A23F%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: common.perch.invalid
Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.advocacy:366847

Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> On 8/25/16, 1:26 PM, in article ahjfu4003.fa@perch.invalid, "Octavian W.
> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
> 
> ... 
>>> I do not want penis checks at bathrooms. Other than that how can you know if
>>> someone does or does not have one when they head into a stall?
>> 
>> Doesn't have to be like that.  The threat of jail time for being caught
>> would be enough of a deterrent.
> 
> How would you get caught without a penis check?
> 

As if trannies are not obvious 99 percent of the time...

(lies below snipped for brevity).