Path: csiph.com!xmission!news.alt.net!not-for-mail
From: owl <owl@rooftop.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome.
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 00:50:01 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: O.W.L.
Lines: 59
Message-ID: <a2.afa3wp@rooftop.invalid>
References: <n0j2gk$dok$1@dont-email.me>   <asde1op03.a@rooftop.pc14fmb5x$.dlg@40tu4zmf$.18crpc14fmb5x$.dlg@40tude.net> <fsa93.fjja9@rooftop.invalid> <3zlnjnpv3aal$.msvgs9kxzbd.dlg@40tude.net> <fsd83.fjai93@rooftop.invalid> <gxdi40fs20tm.lw0mnb6r9m8q$.dlg@40tude.net> <fsdeoe.pg93@rooftop.invalid> <1knlgmcgah550$.q509tgwvijeg$.dlg@40tude.net> <sesf.kf12i@rooftop.invalid> <15k5e5xdsk4dg.11ygd3wgoriti$.dlg@40tude.net> <fsejut83.3a@rooftop.invalid> <1rosxjzvihidk.1m0bo4tey47d.dlg@40tude.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: boom.rooftop.invalid
User-Agent: tin/2.2.1-20140504 ("Tober an Righ") (UNIX) (Linux/3.16.0-4-amd64 (x86_64))
Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.advocacy:328432

Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Oct 2015 00:12:52 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote:
> 
...
>  
>>>> You were then asked:
>>>> 
>>>> 1. Why not?
>>>> 2. Do you think it's normal for two guys to fuck each other in the ass?
>>>> 
>>>> Something will probably again keep you from answering.
>>>> Maybe ignorance.  Maybe fear.
>>> 
>>> Again, key points:
>>> 
>>> 1. Opposed or not to homosexuality.
>>> Answer: I am not opposed.
>>> 
>>> 2. Men fucking each other in the ass being normal.
>>> 
>>> One has nothing to do with the other.
>>> 
>> 
>> Still no answer to the two questions you were asked:
>> 1. Why are you not opposed to homosexuality?
> 
> So now it turns into WHY are you not opposed to homosexuality.

That has always been "question 1".  I see that despite a flurry
of words below, you still fail to answer the question. 

> Not just a simple "are you opposed to homosexuality" which was your
> original question.
> 
> I do wish you would learn to focus, Owl.
> This is getting boring.
> 
> 
>> 2. Do you think two men fucking each other in the ass is normal?
> 
> No I do not.

Finally.  That took you long enough.  Question 2 answered.  Will question
1 ever be answered?  Who knows...

> 
> 
>> You must *really* not want to answer those, so we'll add a third:
>> 3. Why do you fear answering questions 1 and 2?
> 
> I answered question 1 a few posts ago.

Nope.

> You seem unable to read that answer.
> 

Question 1 has always been "Why not".  And you still have not answered.