Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Jolly Roger Newsgroups: comp.mobile.android,comp.mobile.ipad,alt.os.linux Subject: Re: What is the EASIEST way to get a spreadsheet from Linux to iPad & Android Date: 5 Apr 2015 16:59:43 GMT Organization: People for the Ethical Treatment of Pirates Lines: 64 Message-ID: References: <030420150752553758%michelle@michelle.org> <040420151224516708%nospam@nospam.invalid> <040420151044396932%michelle@michelle.org> <040420152159556896%nospam@nospam.invalid> <040420152005215519%michelle@michelle.org> <7cWdnU4RW5IyKb3InZ2dnUU7-KednZ2d@giganews.com> <050420150932104395%nospam@nospam.invalid> X-Trace: individual.net tE9TiefI7UZ1MmjE/RSquwkqmt14Ntvua8wEmOTokXn4MYgL0u Cancel-Lock: sha1:IJuEGV+5ey1qMoYvN1Qn6lz7YSU= X-Face: _.g>n!a$f3/H3jA]>9pN55*5<`}Tud57>1Y%b|b-Y~()~\t,LZ3e up1/bO{=-) User-Agent: slrn/1.0.1 (Darwin) Xref: csiph.com comp.mobile.ipad:47917 On 2015-04-05, Marek Novotny wrote: > On 2015-04-05, nospam wrote: >> >> primitive and that requires an internet connection. > > hate to break it to you dude, but your sync also requires a network > connection Hate to break it to *you*, but there's a distinct different between an internet connection and a local WiFi Direct connection that gets established via Bluetooth LE discovery automatically with zero effort or configuration on the part of the user. > Truly stupid. You're definitely turning out to be that, yes. > How does you photo on your iphone get to your other devices dude? I've already explained it several times, and you've ignored it. I won't bother this time. You're being incredibly thick. > Sneaker-net? No. It uses the network moron. LOL > HAHAHAHAHHAHAA Again, you apparently can't figure out the difference between an internet connection and a local network. Pity. >> that also won't work for photos and many other types of documents. not >> everything is a plain text file. > > And I have shown my script for that. "I spent time writing and debugging my own crappy software that doesn't do near as much" doesn't enable the same level of productivity as "it just works". You lose. HARD FAIL. > Also mentioned Dropbox and OwnCloud. We have this covered if we want > it. No one cares. You may not care about your own productivity, but you don't get to project that onto the rest of us. While you're fucking around with yesterday's "solutions", we're already out the door. >> who cares if it's open source and free. what matters is how productive >> the user is. if a paid app can save hours of time, it pays for itself >> many times over, making the 'free software' more expensive. > > How long do you think it takes for me to type, usync.sh? You don't get to pretend usync.sh wrote itself. Nor do you get to pretend it does the same thing as Apple's Continuity. HARD FAIL. > I assure you, it's less then one second. Which is still slower than Continuity. Thanks for playing. -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR