Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Alan Newsgroups: comp.mobile.android,misc.phone.mobile.iphone,rec.photo.digital Subject: Re: Does anyone here have experience with "photofs" fixing photo naming? Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2025 10:32:49 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 72 Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2025 19:32:50 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="b11c0f35224b392d3b9d18f55a63c497"; logging-data="450690"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX183nLpmcgTsWTCH4RwGODwk5ni2TbO70Cw=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:AQEzQOispjUhIgozfvC+/KzBzA8= Content-Language: en-CA In-Reply-To: Xref: csiph.com comp.mobile.android:148028 misc.phone.mobile.iphone:194705 rec.photo.digital:244454 On 2025-04-22 09:50, Marion wrote: > On Tue, 22 Apr 2025 16:36:03 +0000, Tyrone wrote : > > >> Not to mention that before last week he was whining that it was impossible to >> get to the iOS DCIM folder. Because "walled garden". > > Please don't call the Apple ecosystem a "walled garden" when it's really > more like a subterranean cavern, unlike the real world in almost every way. > >> Now that we have PROVED to him that it easy to do, he has to whine about file >> names? What does he expect? Picture of Arlen at the beach.jpg? >> IMG-3769275.jpg is a "better" name? > > I wonder if you realize how many millions of people have "whined" about the > idiotic way Apple iOS does the file naming on their photos files Tyrone? > >> And look how long it took him to accept the FACT that the iOS SMB server >> worked! He admitted to "googling furiously" to prove that we were wrong. It >> never occurred to him to DL the fucking app and TRY IT! > > First off, I didn't say it didn't work - I said I didn't think nix-based > systems allowed 3rd-party apps to bind to privileged ports, and, I said > that I couldn't find any documentation saying iOS could - and - let's be > clear - neither could you - and neither could anyone find that > documentation. Actually, you REPEATEDLY claimed it COULD NOT POSSIBLY work. Because you KNEW how iOS had to behave. > > So the only way to prove that it worked was to try it out, but what you > don't understand is believing you Apple trolls is like believing that > Charles Manson didn't do it - even as many still insist he's innocent. > > It's a shock that you Apple trolls have ever been right, as you Apple > trolls still insist on imaginary iOS functionality day in and day out. > > Do I need to list all the claims Jolly Roger & nospam have made for > example, where even in the past week Jolly Roger insisted iTunes backs up > his IPA's off of his iOS device when that is impossible. > >> NOW he is whining about not getting a drive letter assigned in Windows when he >> connects to the iOS SMB server. But of course it works when conecting to >> Android. As if the server you are connecting to controls the drive letter in >> the client (Windows in this case). > > I supplied images. I tried it. You didn't try it. You're just guessing. > > What you're suggesting is to use a *different* mapping mechanism. > You don't even realize the discrepancy. > > It might work with that different mapping. > But that's now how it has to work with WebDAV. > > For the record, I will try the mapping using the *DIFFERENT* mechanism that > you suggest, but that doesn't change the fact that "net use" didn't do it. > > (You'd think they "should" give the same results but they well may not.) You are SUCH an idiot: I just turned on "LAN drive" again, and then did the command: "C:\Users\Alan>net use e: \\iPhone16\DCIM" And lo and behold what do I find in File Explorer's sidebar?