Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: "Carlos E.R." Newsgroups: comp.mobile.android Subject: Re: More about RCS. Date: Sun, 5 Jan 2025 22:30:38 +0100 Lines: 18 Message-ID: References: <6snfnj5880vigl6guglovgq28nr3pl1tp4@4ax.com> <2e8r4lx6om.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net r5yAFKbRpGS52u2mhmBe3Aygyu1qAUO5MdWKDTfv88P/ZJMQQx X-Orig-Path: Telcontar.valinor!not-for-mail Cancel-Lock: sha1:u6uEAhCjbNdbGJ7Demx+sYWRJtY= sha256:G0ZWc8mnw4ykS8cVcU4rbSc6kQygdsYOiim7GnhfycY= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: es-ES, en-CA In-Reply-To: Xref: csiph.com comp.mobile.android:146297 On 2025-01-05 22:19, Jörg Lorenz wrote: > On 05.01.25 21:59, Carlos E.R. wrote: >> On 2025-01-05 17:31, Jörg Lorenz wrote: >>> For private communication it almost completely lost its importance and >>> was replaced with Facebook Messenger, WhatsApp, Telegram, Signal, >>> Threema and iMessage. But certainly not RCS. >> >> That's not so in NA. You keep forgetting. > > It is so in NA. People below 60 do not use SMS for private communication > anymore and adolescents hardly know what an SMS is. My contacts in the > US of A use all messengers. SMS is out for more than a decade because of > the very limited functionality. Cost is no factor in this equation. Sigh. -- Cheers, Carlos.