Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: "Carlos E. R." Newsgroups: comp.mobile.android Subject: Re: SMS spoofing Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2026 10:25:56 +0200 Lines: 49 Message-ID: References: <8idu6g1pxnf.dlg@v.nguard.lh> <1htmjbmsfyz04$.dlg@v.nguard.lh> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net rNX1Gh8DhPoE9vPvg7O69QAbAIiEK4oRoNogMhOsf4ZzSlzB8l Cancel-Lock: sha1:RUTeRYh+0Kd93uFaEkVbx91x3ig= sha256:YMVRJ1LOgWdCGC98UJpTCN9tHeYplhN6+GWmZr0XqRM= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: en-GB In-Reply-To: Xref: csiph.com comp.mobile.android:154256 On 2026-06-20 10:14, VanguardLH wrote: > Andy Burns wrote: > >> VanguardLH wrote: >> >>> At this point, I don't think you got phished. I think your dental >>> provider had a hiccup in their accounting system >> >> Dental? I though it was an insurance company ... > > An insurance company of WHAT? Could be health insurance, dental > insurance, car insurance, life insurance, etc. "Insurance" does specify > what type of insurance, and many insurers cover many types of coverage. Does it mater? :-o > > At https://www.ocaso.es/inicio (their home page), that navbar at the top > has the following entries (translated to English): > > Home Deaths Life Health Savings and Investment Other Insurance > > When I went digging there, somehow I ended up landing at > https://www.ocaso.es/servicios/servicio-dental. So, his dentist's > office billed his dental insurer, and the dental insurer billed him. > Or, it could've been any of the other types of insurance covered by > Ocaso. Whether it was some service by someone Carlos uses that > incorrectly billed Ocaso, or Ocaso's hiccup by sending notice to the > wrong insured is something Carlos or Ocaso have to figure out. However, > Carlos mention he logged in somehow differently, and did see a claim > there. The claim at Ocaso should show who submitted it. That Carlos > might remember he did have service there, or it somewhere he never had > service. Home insurance. No dentist involved anywhere. Actually, someone requesting DIY help, which is covered. > > Carlos said elsewhere: > "The insurance claim was true, just assigned to the wrong ID. It was > legitimate, but they have a bad software system. This was explained on > another message here." -- Cheers, Carlos E.R. ES🇪🇸, EU🇪🇺;