Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: "Carlos E. R." Newsgroups: comp.mobile.android Subject: Re: 8MB sms pic Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 08:27:11 +0100 Lines: 23 Message-ID: References: <8q1nbf-hkn.ln1@Telcontar.valinor> <121120182025189475%nospam@nospam.invalid> <121120182142286742%nospam@nospam.invalid> <121120182206273050%nospam@nospam.invalid> <121120182240074233%nospam@nospam.invalid> <121120182332080131%nospam@nospam.invalid> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net 433CMZW14PPjfHq0hm86cgO3xHlkJ95xTLL5p5/mCG88maejqp Cancel-Lock: sha1:Wfe3bEWQ5QDbxExPlS5iO4lv5js= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.3.0 In-Reply-To: <121120182332080131%nospam@nospam.invalid> Content-Language: en-CA Xref: csiph.com comp.mobile.android:57452 On 13/11/2018 05.32, nospam wrote: > In article , 123456789 <12345@12345.com> > wrote: > >>> and a more reliable one at that. >> >> More reliable than my VoIP landline? Not likely. More reliable than my >> cordless answering machine? Not likely squared. > > sms is not guaranteed delivery, making voip more reliable, and who uses > answering machines anymore? if you're not home, it rolls to voicemail, > optionally forwarding to one or more alternate numbers, such as a > cellphone. I have seen several people going back to answering machine because otherwise they are charged money for the automated system. Other people just disable it, like me. -- Cheers, Carlos E.R.