Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: "Rod Speed" Newsgroups: comp.mobile.android,misc.phone.mobile.iphone Subject: Re: Data-Only SIMS, Google Voice, SMS Forwarding, and WeChat in China Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2018 04:55:09 +1000 Lines: 30 Message-ID: References: <250820181330512766%nospam@nospam.invalid> <3fhaod9njs9draokg9tq33o0nile1lukib@4ax.com> <280820181057581242%nospam@nospam.invalid> <24udodlsfkjtdunipf6fiq403sahlshh0v@4ax.com> <290820182306441895%nospam@nospam.invalid> <310820181044499372%nospam@nospam.invalid> <010920181040322151%nospam@nospam.invalid> <050920180915572703%nospam@nospam.invalid> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net Qkpxz4Jy0rnJxV8Rdy7xig50oE7UKgVPRPPEahUedRa3GI4gY= Cancel-Lock: sha1:DNZRybUzMDPmffyDS56KOccBIgc= In-Reply-To: <050920180915572703%nospam@nospam.invalid> X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416 Xref: csiph.com comp.mobile.android:55561 misc.phone.mobile.iphone:113503 "nospam" wrote in message news:050920180915572703%nospam@nospam.invalid... > In article , Chris in > Makati wrote: > >> > >> >> For the third time of trying, why should the called party pay for >> >> airtime usage when there's no similar charge for landline users? >> > >> >landlines aren't free. landline users pay for their phone service and >> >in some cases, pay per minute on top of the monthly fees, which i've >> >explained already. >> >> Exactly. Landline callers pay for calls THEY make. They don't pay for >> received calls. That's what I've been trying to get you to understand. > > they absolutely do. No they do not to receive an extra landline call. > nothing is free. The extra landline call is. > it's either included in the base rate or it's per minute, depending on > provider and plan and in some cases, they pay an additional charge for > cnam dips.