Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: "Rod Speed" Newsgroups: comp.mobile.android,misc.phone.mobile.iphone Subject: Re: Data-Only SIMS, Google Voice, SMS Forwarding, and WeChat in China Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2018 05:18:54 +1000 Lines: 33 Message-ID: References: <280820181057571194%nospam@nospam.invalid> <280820181344320869%nospam@nospam.invalid> <290820181148556915%nospam@nospam.invalid> <290820182306451946%nospam@nospam.invalid> <300820180958221270%nospam@nospam.invalid> <310820181230159097%nospam@nospam.invalid> <8eikod53d7rb7rqo32u0ho35hevq79htic@4ax.com> <010920181040332189%nospam@nospam.invalid> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net Aaru4uwiMWLfz1IyP0ITKQqG8VUONWfe3iJdxIaCh2S3caQIk= Cancel-Lock: sha1:CevAgJrrskDXDhyXhc9nf7l4J6g= In-Reply-To: <010920181040332189%nospam@nospam.invalid> X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416 Xref: csiph.com comp.mobile.android:55420 misc.phone.mobile.iphone:113356 "nospam" wrote in message news:010920181040332189%nospam@nospam.invalid... > In article , sms > wrote: > >> Using a credit card to pay is also respectful of the other customers in >> line behind you since it's much faster than a cash transaction. > > no it isn't, other than if someone is fishing for exact change, which > is rare. > > paying cash is normally faster, BULLSHIT. > sometimes quite a bit faster, BULLSHIT. > which is why there are sometimes cash-only lines. Nope. > credit card payment terminals often require one or more taps to confirm > the purchase, although that's much better now that signatures are no > longer required. sometimes a card is not readable and requires multiple > swipes, dips or taps. And apple pay is even faster and never needs one or more taps to confirm purchase.