Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Frank Slootweg Newsgroups: comp.mobile.android,uk.telecom Subject: Re: Handling phone loss Date: 6 Sep 2015 15:26:07 GMT Organization: NOYB Lines: 17 Message-ID: References: X-Trace: individual.net ls8kUqoc/OmOGCewwnTV2ApgYqaAbKAFA4KBjqhIOEK0CCVaOE X-Orig-Path: not-for-mail Cancel-Lock: sha1:PEKvjKGhe4slnrr3bSiCE2yD6JI= User-Agent: tin/1.6.2-20030910 ("Pabbay") (UNIX) (CYGWIN_NT-6.2-WOW64/1.5.22(0.156/4/2) (i686)) Hamster/2.0.2.2 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 150905-1, 09/05/2015), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Xref: csiph.com comp.mobile.android:22283 uk.telecom:21259 Andy Burns wrote: > Frank Slootweg wrote: [Most stuff already settled with Bob.] > > The Play Store app is even a *required* app. Without it, the phone is > > basically useless. > > Well *a* store app is required, but not necessarily *the* Play store > app, some manufacturers substitute their own, I would avoid one that did. Are you sure they are *substituting* the (Google) Play Store app, not just providing an *additional* app for *their* (the manufacturer's) 'store'? For example Samsung is doing the latter, i.e. an *additional* app for the *Samsung* store.