Path: csiph.com!au2pb.net!feeder.erje.net!1.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder2.ecngs.de!ecngs!feeder.ecngs.de!81.171.118.61.MISMATCH!peer01.fr7!news.highwinds-media.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: "JHY" Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.android Subject: Re: voting booths in republican areas Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2015 21:08:33 +1000 Lines: 39 Message-ID: References: <1441f$55abc986$43da7656$24535@nntpswitch.blueworldhosting.com> <448fcd2fbde463f54a667ea9a3b0f02b@dizum.com> <050820151241371909%michelle@michelle.org> <050820151341176729%michelle@michelle.org> <060820151725205307%leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> <070820150008516477%leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net Z9ZCJYytkbQXK8od7rqzKA+fBtJVZxkn/Q/jqUxjuV7b8F9fo= Cancel-Lock: sha1:p6yvC4dbY7Fzq3c8BuwM++vwpzU= In-Reply-To: <070820150008516477%leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416 X-Received-Bytes: 2845 X-Received-Body-CRC: 2494350557 Xref: csiph.com misc.phone.mobile.iphone:76634 comp.mobile.android:21806 "Leonard Blaisdell" wrote in message news:070820150008516477%leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net... > In article , JHY > wrote: > >> Sure, but it isn't possible to work out in advance that a particular >> result is going to be that close and organise 156 people who >> know someone who has moved away and won't be voting so >> you can claim to be them and vote instead of them. And even >> if that was possible, the other major's goons could do that too >> so it wouldn't change the result unless they did it much more >> badly than your lot did and did it with a lot more than 156 people. > I'm not interested in one possibility. I'm interested in "all" > possibilities. But its only the close results where there would be any point in attempting vote fraud, so they wont be doing vote fraud just in case it turns out to be a close result, because its impossible to get enough fraudulent votes to matter. > In a edge of the razor-blade thin election in a red > state, I'd be deeply suspicious if a Republican won. More fool you. > As it was, Franken won and Obamacare became the law of the land. But there isn't a shred of evidence that any voter fraud was responsible for that. Anyone who tells you > different including those posting with liberal cites in here are full > of it. What a stunning line in rational argument you have there.