Path: csiph.com!aioe.org!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!news.tal.de!news.wtal.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid>
Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.android
Subject: Re: IMEI alteration is not fraud
Date: 1 Aug 2015 19:18:51 GMT
Organization: NOYB
Lines: 40
Message-ID: <d24kcrFffg5U1@mid.individual.net>
References: <5nacra9soj5cmo1lb9bl6f9uhahbk96ive@4ax.com>   <br5drad1chcqv5oht33h7rvl8kj5acdoq2@4ax.com> <d1npo2F86koU1@mid.individual.net> <3ngdra9anlm5knrk0uukub1qbh623qcn61@4ax.com> <d1ubjtFruuiU1@mid.individual.net> <a90kra5pefofo1fq36lq3p5sk2pokm1o89@4ax.com> <d1vim8F7ghtU1@mid.individual.net> <la8lratmsl3e7sctesci1qs5me00ksfton@4ax.com> <d20c22Fd37jU1@mid.individual.net> <a3omra9tbup0de6s9cr20u5v6hjm90qtsn@4ax.com> <d21snjFp38sU1@mid.individual.net> <71lnra5sbo0nhukl0qmfpjhpefgmlqvtc2@4ax.com>
X-Trace: individual.net iR1oIfAKxFxDSNQ46MV5yAi4IEpYSiUtqptbfhvuYVtAMNoLSq
X-Orig-Path: not-for-mail
Cancel-Lock: sha1:lBl0TQ0AqixL3JvZXjUSmkoD1qI=
User-Agent: tin/1.6.2-20030910 ("Pabbay") (UNIX) (CYGWIN_NT-6.2-WOW64/1.5.22(0.156/4/2) (i686)) Hamster/2.0.2.2
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 150801-1, 08/01/2015), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Xref: aioe.org misc.phone.mobile.iphone:76476 comp.mobile.android:21615

BobbyK <bknight@conramp.net> wrote:
> On 31 Jul 2015 18:22:43 GMT, Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid>
> wrote:
> 
> >BobbyK <bknight@conramp.net> wrote:
> >> On Fri, 31 Jul 2015 14:24:53 +1000, "Rod Speed"
> >> <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >"BobbyK" <bknight@Conramp.net> wrote in message 
> >> >news:la8lratmsl3e7sctesci1qs5me00ksfton@4ax.com...
> >> >> On Fri, 31 Jul 2015 07:18:57 +1000, "Rod Speed"
> >> >> <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> ><reams of you desperately attempting to bullshit your
> >> >way out of your predicament that fools absolutely no
> >> >one at all, as always, flushed where it belongs>
> >> > 
> >> Your usual lame response that took several hours for you to
> >> compose....pitiful.  Only used when you're stumped and have no actual
> >> answer.
> >
> >  Talking about lame, you *do* realize that there are other timezones
> >than yours, don't you? So "that took several hours for you to compose"
> >is utter bollocks and should be left out, unless of course you want to
> >look as silly as Roddles.
> What you don't realize is that I wrote this weeks ago in response to
> this bit of stupidity from him. My reference to time is that he had to
> work to compose this ongoing tripe as a response to anyone with whom
> he disagrees.

  What you don't realize is that a response should make sense in the
context in which it is written. People can't look inside your head and
probably wouldn't want to.

  Your first response of this type was already lame (because this kind
of response from Roddles is one of his many recordings, i.e. no time
to compose), your umpteen repetitions are just as silly as Roddles'.

> What happened to EOD?  :-)

  The References: header says it didn't.