Path: csiph.com!aioe.org!news.mixmin.net!news2.arglkargh.de!feeder.erje.net!1.eu.feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Jolly Roger Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.android,alt.internet.wireless Subject: Re: What is a decent DOCSIS3.0 modem with WiFi? Date: 12 Jul 2015 16:37:47 GMT Organization: People for the Ethical Treatment of Pirates Lines: 24 Message-ID: References: <55a1e5f2$0$24446$c3e8da3$f6268168@news.astraweb.com> <120720150909113155%michelle@michelle.org> X-Trace: individual.net PlTERfbaIBPXRZxhdD6r2Akqb8H8IPJDI2kKMzdmbL6ONKZbun Cancel-Lock: sha1:cTo58i+u7LIPgqTFFnELgY8bT70= X-Face: _.g>n!a$f3/H3jA]>9pN55*5<`}Tud57>1Y%b|b-Y~()~\t,LZ3e up1/bO{=-) User-Agent: slrn/1.0.1 (Darwin) Xref: aioe.org misc.phone.mobile.iphone:75660 comp.mobile.android:20858 alt.internet.wireless:14506 On 2015-07-12, Michelle Steiner wrote: > In article , Jolly Roger > wrote: > >> I use Comcast with my own cable modem (a Motorola SURFboard SB6121). My >> bill is $12.95/month cheaper without the equipment rental fee. Highly >> recommended. > > I have an SB6121 also; I was wondering whether replacing it with an > SB6141 is worth the expense. My carrier is Cox Communications. It seems the major difference between them is that the SB6141 can bond up to eight downlink channels while the SB6121 can bond only up to four channels. That means the SB6141 can provide double the downlink throughput of the SB6121 (SB6121: 160 Mb/s versus SB6141: 320 Mb/s). Most people don't have such speedy connections though. If your internet downlink speed is capped below ~100 Mb/s I doubt you'd notice a difference at all between the two. -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR