Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!1.eu.feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address>
Newsgroups: comp.misc,alt.folklore.computers
Subject: Re: [CM] Why did Borland fail?
Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2015 22:47:39 +1000
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <cu5bfbFqdekU2@mid.individual.net>
References: <mlj48r$esq$1@solani.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net dZPqZWJ7/BstNuHNPs/VYwh5hRz1Ko5GBx72adpkOFFOLI7/L9
Cancel-Lock: sha1:EQ+7/9E2JJOa8CkEm5F5kE3j4oo=
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
In-Reply-To: <mlj48r$esq$1@solani.org>
Xref: csiph.com comp.misc:7906

On 14/06/2015 3:42 PM, RS Wood wrote:
>  From the «miss those guys» department:
> Title: Why did Borland fail?
> Author:
> Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2015 15:24:24 -0400
> Link: http://www.quora.com/Why-did-Borland-fail/answer/Danny-Thorpe?share=1&
>
> Comments[1]
>
> Links:
> [1]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9712267 (link)
>
>
> --
> Posting to comp.misc, sci.misc, and misc.news.internet.discuss
>

Yes, management regards developers as plug-compatible bodies.

Sylvia.