Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.fsmpi.rwth-aachen.de!news-1.dfn.de!news.dfn.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: RS Wood Newsgroups: comp.misc Subject: Re: Why Johnny can?t code Date: 2 Sep 2014 18:24:45 GMT Lines: 14 Message-ID: References: <020920141223320871%timstreater@greenbee.net> <87d2be3zow.fsf@bsb.me.uk> Reply-To: randy@therandymon.com X-Trace: individual.net NGocIbnK8Yc5FZ2FMDbhZA9jp6hO4QPByRgU9iq80lUiVr4fl5 Cancel-Lock: sha1:v3XuZ/GiKwu0C3BYUZra2ePm8eU= User-Agent: slrn/1.0.1 (Linux) Xref: csiph.com comp.misc:4656 On 2014-09-02, Scott Alfter wrote: > HGR:FOR I=0 TO 1 STEP 0:HCOLOR=RND(1)*8:HPLOT RND(1)*280,RND(1)*160 TO > RND(1)*280,RND(1)*160:NEXT I > > and get something right away. The only other possibly interactive > programming language with graphics capability that comes to mind is > PostScript, but that's about all that it does. If you tried to teach kids postscript they'd change disciplines and go study anthropology or gender studies or something, or maybe slit their wrists. Postscript isn't fun. TeX isn't either. I learned Pascal and FORTRAN-77 back in the day. Why can't those be taught? Pascal was pretty darned simple.