Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.fsmpi.rwth-aachen.de!news-1.dfn.de!news.dfn.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address>
Newsgroups: comp.misc
Subject: Another Paypal update
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 13:36:26 +1000
Lines: 11
Message-ID: <c5ijdsFbo7aU1@mid.individual.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net 9TO80g0Sm1V7/Ri+0h5u3Q6Xjj4HW0xT+XbuNwtgDAyk9R9OBG
Cancel-Lock: sha1:fTkpAtBPezp4etRm/762leuJ5+o=
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
Xref: csiph.com comp.misc:4501

Was advised of another Paypal policy update today.

According to my records, that's the 18th policy, user, or legal 
agreement update in less than three and half years.

I wonder whether courts in some jurisdictions would consider this to be 
an abuse of the provision that allows Paypal to make unilateral changes 
to the agreements, and refuse to bind a customer where some provision is 
unreasonable.

Sylvia.