Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!news-1.dfn.de!news.dfn.de!news.informatik.hu-berlin.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: "2ju" <2ju@gmail.com> Newsgroups: comp.misc,alt.sys.pdp11,alt.folklore.computers Subject: Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Date: Sun, 25 May 2014 20:44:08 +1000 Lines: 57 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="UTF-8"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net LrHA7OyUDSAkjOlLygyg5g9xBeOj8h+PGNjmUs6mQpU2ulf0A= Cancel-Lock: sha1:Ob8XIbopuHpzcgX/fNMErhJZj78= In-Reply-To: X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416 Xref: csiph.com comp.misc:3140 "Bob Eager" wrote in message news:budms9Fe217U1@mid.individual.net... > On Sun, 25 May 2014 08:19:18 +1000, 2ju wrote: > >> "Bob Eager" wrote in message >> news:bucgt5Fmh2vU5@mid.individual.net... >>> On Sun, 25 May 2014 06:39:31 +1000, 2ju wrote: >>> >>>> "Bob Eager" wrote in message >>>> news:bubna0Fmh2vU4@mid.individual.net... >>>>> On Sat, 24 May 2014 20:37:28 +1000, 2ju wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> "Stanley Daniel de Liver" wrote in message >>>>>> news:op.xgcvqq1jo4et73@dell3100... >>>>>>> On Sat, 24 May 2014 00:55:06 +0100, glen herrmannsfeldt >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> In alt.sys.pdp11 Dale R Worley >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> (snip) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The fortnight is little-used, but its meaning is clear if you >>>>>>>>> look it up in the dictionary. The problem with the stone is that >>>>>>>>> there are two versions: 14 lb. and 20 lb, and since it is not >>>>>>>>> used at all in the US, there's no way for a USanian to find out >>>>>>>>> which definition is the one used for weighing humans. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I remember when Canada sold gasoline (and probably other things) >>>>>>>> in imperial gallons, which were 5/4 US gallons. (Or close to >>>>>>>> that.) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> We don't have gasoline in the Britain, just petroleum. >>>>>> >>>>>> Petrol, actually. >>>>> >>>>> Petroleum spirit is, I believe, the correct term. >>>> >>>> There is no such thing as a correct term with something like that. >>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Petroleum_spirits >>> >>> Perhaps not; to a point I agree with you. However, it is the dominant >>> term in the names of documents etc. associated with the UK regulations >>> pertaining to the substance in question....! >> >> Sure, but that is just the rather quaint old fashioned terminology so >> often seen in regulations. > > I'll leave you to believe that, then. Its got nothing to do with belief, everything to do with how regulations are worded.