Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed1.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.003 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:Python': 0.06; 'odd': 0.07; 'plenty': 0.07; 'next,': 0.09; 'prefixes': 0.09; 'repeated': 0.09; 'spelling': 0.09; 'subject:using': 0.09; 'python': 0.11; 'from:addr:mrabarnett.plus.com': 0.16; 'from:addr:python': 0.16; 'from:name:mrab': 0.16; 'line).': 0.16; 'message-id:@mrabarnett.plus.com': 0.16; 'personally,': 0.16; 'received:192.168.1.4': 0.16; 'roy': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; '>>>': 0.22; 'saying': 0.22; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; 'mon,': 0.24; '(or': 0.24; 'mention': 0.26; 'skip:" 20': 0.27; 'header:In-Reply- To:1': 0.27; 'chris': 0.29; 'am,': 0.29; 'words': 0.29; 'dec': 0.30; 'code': 0.31; 'another': 0.32; 'sense': 0.34; 'common': 0.35; 'much.': 0.36; 'next': 0.36; 'thank': 0.38; 'to:addr:python- list': 0.38; 'rather': 0.38; 'short': 0.38; 'does': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'enough': 0.39; 'even': 0.60; 'read': 0.60; 'guy': 0.60; 'more': 0.64; 'smith': 0.68; 'obvious': 0.74; '11:45': 0.84; 'everywhere.': 0.84; 'keystrokes': 0.84 X-CM-Score: 0.00 X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=ZuVjKrLG c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=0nF1XD0wxitMEM03M9B4ZQ==:117 a=0nF1XD0wxitMEM03M9B4ZQ==:17 a=0Bzu9jTXAAAA:8 a=xSRs65CQCjkA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=EBOSESyhAAAA:8 a=VUfPOBp7AAAA:8 a=sv-UV7dSj-_3pAJwDWAA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 X-AUTH: mrabarnett:2500 Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 03:09:50 +0000 From: MRAB User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: python-list@python.org Subject: Re: Python Iterables struggling using map() built-in References: <004e01d01173$e1641c10$a42c5430$@gmail.com> <5484e3d8$0$13013$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 20 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1418008379 news.xs4all.nl 2888 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:59488 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:82096 On 2014-12-08 01:00, Chris Angelico wrote: > On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Roy Smith wrote: >>> I take it as "result", which makes plenty of sense to me. >> >> OK, so spell it out. Three more keystrokes (well, plus another three >> when you use it on the next line). And one of them is a vowel; they >> don't even cost much. The next guy who has to read your code will thank >> you for it. > > Maybe. Personally, I don't mind the odd abbreviation; they keep the > code small enough to eyeball, rather than spelling everything out > everywhere. Using "cur" (or "curr") for current, "next" for next, > "prev" for previous, as prefixes to a short word saying *what* they're > the current/next/previous of, is sufficiently obvious IMO to justify > the repeated use of the abbreviation. Why does Python have "int" and > "str" rather than "integer" and "string"? Or, worse, > "arbitrary_precision_integer" and "unicode_codepoint_string"? Common > words get shortened - it's a legit form of Huffman compression. > Not to mention "len", "def", "iter", etc.