Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed2.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.001 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'else:': 0.03; 'argument': 0.05; 'importing': 0.05; "subject:' ": 0.07; 'os.path': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'subject:modules': 0.09; 'subject:question': 0.10; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'two.': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'module': 0.19; 'slightly': 0.19; 'code,': 0.22; 'import': 0.22; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; 'convenient': 0.24; 'lets': 0.24; 'replace': 0.24; 'header:X -Complaints-To:1': 0.27; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'chris': 0.29; 'relative': 0.30; "i'm": 0.30; 'code': 0.31; 'received:132': 0.31; 'second,': 0.31; 'anyone': 0.31; 'front': 0.32; 'quite': 0.32; 'actual': 0.34; 'subject:from': 0.34; 'could': 0.34; 'one,': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'throughout': 0.37; 'turn': 0.37; 'sometimes': 0.38; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'pm,': 0.38; 'rather': 0.38; 'does': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'either': 0.39; 'received:org': 0.40; 'first': 0.61; 'name': 0.63; 'refer': 0.63; 'more': 0.64; '(while': 0.84; 'etc,': 0.84 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: python-list@python.org From: Wolfgang Maier Subject: Re: Style question: Importing modules from packages - 'from' vs 'as' Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2014 18:19:01 +0100 References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: px1.ruf.uni-freiburg.de User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 29 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1417713545 news.xs4all.nl 2911 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:36229 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:81923 On 12/03/2014 12:02 PM, Chris Angelico wrote: > When importing a module from a subpackage, it's sometimes convenient > to refer to it throughout the code with a one-part name rather than > two. I'm going to use 'os.path' for the examples, but my actual > use-case is a custom package where the package name is, in the > application, quite superfluous. > > Throughout the code, I want to refer to "path.split()", > "path.isfile()", etc, without the "os." in front of them. I could do > either of these: > > import os.path as path > from os import path > > Which one would you recommend? Does it depend on context? > One argument not yet brought up by anyone else: if you ever wanted to make the module part of your own package and turn the import into a relative one, only the second, but not the first form lets you replace the package name with . : from . import path (while import .path is a SyntaxError, so you'd need a slightly more complicated rewrite). Wolfgang