Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!news.mixmin.net!newsreader4.netcologne.de!news.netcologne.de!novso.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed1a.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.012 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.98; '*S*': 0.00; 'python3': 0.07; 'subject:How': 0.10; 'python': 0.11; 'def': 0.12; '2.7': 0.14; 'main():': 0.16; 'unlikely': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'differ': 0.19; 'thu,': 0.19; 'seems': 0.21; 'import': 0.22; 'documented': 0.24; 'skip': 0.24; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'url:bugs': 0.29; 'change,': 0.30; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; 'getting': 0.31; '13,': 0.31; 'subject:some': 0.31; 'url:python': 0.33; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'url:org': 0.36; 'nov': 0.38; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'fact': 0.38; 'pm,': 0.38; 'does': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'between': 0.67; 'behavior': 0.77 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=viX7ceHZ5jAb/V+xKv9DGMSFTTV7dpb1TD6quM+YTtA=; b=ll5twgg2W0tsnReAZ+cD0SaISlm6aixEOFnJUk27NaU2Goz5vsMDks9KQCc1THJt9e DTUJdUBjhjjvJv3PwuTjZXJRfqxkLSm0ghQ71p0va3X3/hJElwFrY4sbPZ3BRyZ2DdzA HYXQ3zkItIuKHIfJEUqDNu/JWvk43cCZP4oeR1eL7HE0ZGWl7fpsnIUgQT/tnhuC5xwT 2GkoRSRHSgpdEPdeuL23QZBoT1DSmPuxPTQnJBrwMvqa+hsCR3p5lCJYHwIAzifR3Zi3 OoVKZbOzZAThGOgZjDMVEWapi5iuTnjismiOct8/KguemCKXWFjcxiIfOv0GqfCB6Vak AygA== X-Received: by 10.70.45.233 with SMTP id q9mr6176614pdm.24.1415919433865; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 14:57:13 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <71b9a111-283f-4006-bc9d-e35782d9888c@googlegroups.com> <5464F958.4070404@stoneleaf.us> From: Ian Kelly Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 15:56:33 -0700 Subject: Re: How about some syntactic sugar for " __name__ == '__main__' "? To: Python Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 28 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1415919443 news.xs4all.nl 2964 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:44995 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:80710 On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Skip Montanaro wrote: > On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 2:44 PM, Skip Montanaro > wrote: >> What's not documented is >> the behavior of calling atexit.register() while atexit._run_exitfuncs >> is running. That's an implementation detail, and though unlikely to >> change, it might be worthwhile getting that behavior documented. > > http://bugs.python.org/issue22867 In fact it seems the behavior does differ between Python 2.7 and Python 3.4: $ cat testatexit.py import atexit @atexit.register def main(): atexit.register(goodbye) @atexit.register def goodbye(): print("Goodbye") $ python2 testatexit.py Goodbye Goodbye $ python3 testatexit.py Goodbye