Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed3a.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.030 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.94; '*S*': 0.00; 'restart': 0.09; 'subject:skip:f 10': 0.09; 'subject:still': 0.09; 'cc:addr:python- list': 0.11; 'windows': 0.15; 'from:addr:rosuav': 0.16; 'from:name:chris angelico': 0.16; 'programmatic': 0.16; 'reasonably': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.22; 'server.': 0.24; 'cc:2**0': 0.24; 'van': 0.27; 'header:In-Reply- To:1': 0.27; 'am,': 0.29; "doesn't": 0.30; 'message- id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; 'workaround': 0.31; 'fri,': 0.33; "i'd": 0.34; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'skip:b 40': 0.39; 'subject:" ': 0.39; 'tell': 0.60; 'simple': 0.61; 'more': 0.64; 'subject:High': 0.84; 'to:none': 0.92; 'technique': 0.93 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:cc :content-type; bh=S/ch1lBa+4kaRnmKEZQXl/gtv47HoLSFZJme+aXYUJ4=; b=GbeZU6vCihA9lxyCyexywncE7NTGFXeXcctbbFImGbK8CeuKQb9QtSonGaSFBrSWoF x/97LB5eWMglxpfL+arMPXUeItnycTvjEHyK/KgAdLsOGxtdKhl8Y5X5voK7QKA1sEKe V5S/x2qRm500Q8spGB8u7lajpC2vy7lMreB27ym7dvy0opg6Q71JkpT1pFuyVEKWLSiF 9LbqX68YMVIjwZ504NGui7acVsSbEOp0OWUFiNYpA0dgH43y3TqdTLVXGpLX2bWJfuxC b6D/8dSm4Z6s0LiKPlQ7QKT9eI8ZuExRePscd70lLX1XjABl3NGU3KvwsK7pXP1nq31Q jt0g== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.66.174 with SMTP id g14mr1189902igt.34.1412890933399; Thu, 09 Oct 2014 14:42:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <7ac186c3-2dbc-4cfa-ab58-37854aeb59d1@googlegroups.com> Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 08:42:13 +1100 Subject: Re: "High water" Memory fragmentation still a thing? From: Chris Angelico Cc: "python-list@python.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 16 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1412890937 news.xs4all.nl 2897 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:54235 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:78915 On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 8:39 AM, Emile van Sebille wrote: > On 10/8/2014 10:28 AM, bryanjugglercryptographer@yahoo.com.dmarc.invalid > wrote: > >> That doesn't mean to tell a human administrator to regularly restart the >> server. It's programmatic and it's a reasonably simple and well-established >> design pattern. > > I'd call it more a compensation technique than a design pattern*. You know, > like rebooting windows routinely. :) > > *) Alternately known as a workaround or kludge. That sounds about right to me. ChrisA