Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!bcyclone01.am1.xlned.com!bcyclone01.am1.xlned.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed3.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.009 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.98; '*S*': 0.00; 'python,': 0.02; 'subject:Python': 0.06; 'received:198': 0.07; 'guys.': 0.09; 'windows,': 0.09; 'runs': 0.10; 'python': 0.11; 'beautifully': 0.16; 'fine.': 0.16; 'happily': 0.16; 'received:66.196': 0.16; 'stuff,': 0.16; 'virtualbox': 0.16; 'extensions': 0.16; 'language': 0.16; 'thanks,': 0.17; 'slightly': 0.19; 'seems': 0.21; 'programming': 0.22; 'to:name:python-list@python.org': 0.22; 'paul': 0.24; "i've": 0.25; 'script': 0.25; 'installed': 0.27; 'tim': 0.29; "i'm": 0.30; 'work.': 0.31; 'easier': 0.31; 'integrating': 0.31; 'linux.': 0.31; 'produces': 0.31; 'running': 0.33; 'older': 0.33; 'received:66': 0.35; 'except': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'version': 0.36; '(we': 0.36; 'revert': 0.36; 'charset:us- ascii': 0.36; 'thanks': 0.36; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'system,': 0.38; 'focused': 0.38; 'needed': 0.38; 'to:addr:python- list': 0.38; 'fact': 0.38; 'extremely': 0.39; 'itself': 0.39; 'though,': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:bf1.yahoo.com': 0.60; 'received:mail.bf1.yahoo.com': 0.60; 'most': 0.60; "you're": 0.61; 'information': 0.63; 'such': 0.63; 'our': 0.64; 'header:Reply-To:1': 0.67; 'received:bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com': 0.74; 'from:addr:att.net': 0.83; 'swimming': 0.84 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 730907.23774.bm@omp1020.access.mail.bf1.yahoo.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=att.net; s=s1024; t=1412701499; bh=Yq6lIl6vvXNrMS3ewsojA/ZGGUjSIWxG6zhV9L/bbss=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=rqVKzddtzqdhSxALUfp7y6o0k6ffTiaTP0+9AQ33PeR8b/pGMf3rH2a7kp+lwpleVaIHyToTLc0SP2+0qxEQFJRGpPKWiVMmAhqDPVm8AxgP9xl7rvEu7d6kQBQFl5IM5lkstt99qZBYMwBH9gdvZ/RDvdpdz6bxjHptU5cRFow= X-YMail-OSG: 8PiMPHwVM1kmBzTnU012.LgeVvKxrmcQnrYABJBiJCqeyKQ rryS7tJ8k7Dsmii0bTcMWQscHsg1deaxw8bHqt4_CqSh0R4KeSU5vtgwTfTQ N_qKvP9Vzj5HR4ko7KwQNgTI8atUThu5s6ddUxGXm19Q5spHuMhcy8koCb8p f9vb0gEwowlOnVdzqhdzJSeHupYK9hitW1XuZoh3ZEnpJYQHwaRlNCvaRSL6 8j_ON2_34Q2Wq87hMfQEIU830KP25W9HVQwxcXH49c19VE7ahDuFOEykWi8k 6nbZupDHbCZhqXODJx2_a4l0lMFvWslisaRLbMm5bpFDmIui5uR9tnyxepmZ ESkBDDexRAtsbGgjbfK4YrOg8rXVe_BIdoFSRbPlB_HevWI1eMIlwY2nTkZI s3Vof0ssWCzLhkFcazKzDZMeLoOUA2.YQ3stD_rt9z1WRf3dU7gI8syU.yhd _f9qXQ6oropIfz8pqWqQ8.Azubhp4Wsvoi2NlbC7NS0gTtrINDzixXhziFxh cmxbgDQjykXYaB6olL293CMST_U5enbvXQUqZ X-Rocket-MIMEInfo: 002.001, VGltIEcuOgo.IE9mIGNvdXJzZSwgaWYgeW91J3JlIGhhcHB5IHRvIHdvcmsgd2l0aCBhIHNsaWdodGx5IG9sZGVyCj4gdmVyc2lvbiBvZiBQeXRob24sIHN1Y2ggYXMgMy4yLCB0aGVuIHlvdSBzaG91bGQgYmUgZmluZS4KCldlbGwsCiBJIGp1c3QgaW5zdGFsbGVkIDMuMi41IGluIFcySyBhbmQgYWxsIG9mIG15ICJzdHVmZiIgc2VlbXMgdG8gd29yay4gSSdtIGEKIGhhcHB5IGNhbXBlci4gTWFueSB0aGFua3MgZm9yIHRoZSBpbmZvcm1hdGlvbiBhbmQgbGluayEKCkNocmlzQToKPiBXb3cuIEkgd29uZGVyLCABMAEBAQE- X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.203.696 Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2014 10:04:58 -0700 From: Carl Distefano Subject: Re: Python 3.4.1 on W2K? To: "python-list@python.org" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="1071596321-1338820027-1412701498=:34731" X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list Reply-To: Carl Distefano List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 48 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1412701628 news.xs4all.nl 2871 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:56634 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl X-Received-Bytes: 8018 X-Received-Body-CRC: 594372191 Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:78807 --1071596321-1338820027-1412701498=:34731 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Tim G.: > Of course, if you're happy to work with a slightly older > version of Python, such as 3.2, then you should be fine. Well, I just installed 3.2.5 in W2K and all of my "stuff" seems to work. I'm a happy camper. Many thanks for the information and link! ChrisA: > Wow. I wonder, since you're already poking around with > extremely legacy stuff, would it be easier for you to use OS/2 > instead of Win2K? Paul Smedley still produces OS/2 builds of > Python, and OS/2 itself runs happily under VirtualBox (we have > an OS/2 VM still on our network here, and I use Python to > manage its backups). Might not end up any better than your > current system, but it might be! That's actually an interesting idea. OS/2 was our OS of choice in the '90s. XyWrite ran beautifully under it, and when we needed extensions to the XyWrite Programming Language (XPL) we used Rexx ("RexXPL"). Since last year I've been using Python instead ("XPyL"). The fact is, though, most XyWriters are running XyWrite under Windows, except for the few running it under Linux. Much of our script development since then has focused on integrating Xy with Windows, so to revert to OS/2 would be swimming against the tide. But I may just try it anyway! Thanks, guys. Pal A. --1071596321-1338820027-1412701498=:34731 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Tim G.:
> Of course, if you're happy to work with a slightly older
> version of Python, such as 3.2, then you should be fine.

Well, I just installed 3.2.5 in W2K and all of my "stuff" seems to work. I'm a happy camper. Many thanks for the information and link!

ChrisA:
> Wow. I wonder, since you're already poking around with
> extremely legacy stuff, would it be easier for you to use OS/2
> instead of Win2K? Paul Smedley still produces OS/2 builds of
> Python, and OS/2 itself runs happily under VirtualBox (we have
> an OS/2 VM still on our network here, and I use Python to
> manage its backups). Might not end up any better than your
> current system, but it might be!

That's actually an interesting idea. OS/2 was our OS of choice in the '90s. XyWrite ran beautifully under it, and when we needed extensions to the XyWrite Programming Language (XPL) we used Rexx ("RexXPL"). Since last year I've been using Python instead ("XPyL"). The fact is, though, most XyWriters are running XyWrite under Windows, except for the few running it under Linux. Much of our script development since then has focused on integrating Xy with Windows, so to revert to OS/2 would be swimming against the tide. But I may just try it anyway!

Thanks, guys.
Pal A.

--1071596321-1338820027-1412701498=:34731--