Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!nntp.club.cc.cmu.edu!ra.nrl.navy.mil!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!panix!not-for-mail From: Grant Edwards Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Subject: Re: A syntax question Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 16:11:22 +0000 (UTC) Organization: PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC Lines: 25 Message-ID: References: <3l48w.682048$9R5.402039@fx29.am4> NNTP-Posting-Host: 67-130-15-94.dia.static.qwest.net X-Trace: reader1.panix.com 1415635882 16966 67.130.15.94 (10 Nov 2014 16:11:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@panix.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 16:11:22 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: slrn/1.0.1 (Linux) Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:80471 On 2014-11-10, alister wrote: > On Mon, 10 Nov 2014 14:44:53 +0000, Grant Edwards wrote: > >> On 2014-11-10, David Palao wrote: >> >>>> My crystal ball is currently in for repair and is not expected back in >>>> the foreseeable future. >>> >>> Without a crystal ball, this prediction might be not well founded. >> >> That isn't a prediction. It's an explicit statement of no prediction. >> He said that it is "not expected back" rather than "expected not to be >> back". They're two different things. The former asserts a _lack_ of >> expection/prediction. The latter asserts an expectation/prediction. > > It was only a a joke maybe it was a bit to subtle I know, but in c.l.p, even jokes get nicely pednatic answers. ;) -- Grant Edwards grant.b.edwards Yow! The FALAFEL SANDWICH at lands on my HEAD and I gmail.com become a VEGETARIAN ...