Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.fsmpi.rwth-aachen.de!news.swapon.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.python
Subject: Re: operator module functions
Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2014 10:37:24 +1300
Lines: 13
Message-ID: <c9lp4mFl997U1@mid.individual.net>
References: <54349662$0$12987$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <facda5ec-ecd9-43d0-99b3-b98f945a9a2d@googlegroups.com> <mailman.14675.1412760741.18130.python-list@python.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net 3UNttRRW8W/4JajDjlKunQsjCXUc1ECaXtmEHSTOfFuAbt8vv4
Cancel-Lock: sha1:EjvUoRc/ZiNskMnPWTUpcLITpy0=
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.5 (Macintosh/20050711)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
In-Reply-To: <mailman.14675.1412760741.18130.python-list@python.org>
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:78853

Chris Angelico wrote:

>>>>operator.add is operator.__add__
> True

That doesn't always seem to have been the case, however.
In Python 2.7 and 3.3, I get

 >>> operator.add is operator.__add__
False

-- 
Greg