Path: csiph.com!news.swapon.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Michael Unger Newsgroups: comp.lang.postscript Subject: Re: Embedding strings in multiple languages into PostScript Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 20:49:32 +0200 Organization: not that I'm aware of ... Lines: 27 Message-ID: References: <5a179bd6-9f26-428a-80e0-935a4e5e41df@googlegroups.com> Reply-To: 2016Q2.usenet.michaelunger@spamgourmet.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: individual.net CDQQoo8Pd08tERUuE+dBVgvNfj95llrIelLisL56kkF2Bkdk/U Cancel-Lock: sha1:37o6ecjC4c2KKGh1s+xCKupzQ30= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.24) Gecko/20100228 SeaMonkey/1.1.19 In-Reply-To: <5a179bd6-9f26-428a-80e0-935a4e5e41df@googlegroups.com> Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.postscript:2553 On 2016-04-29 18:57, "jdaw1" wrote: >> Why not consolidate these two documents into a single one? Width: 8.5 >> inches (US Letter), height: 210 millimeters (ISO A4). That seems to be= a >> rather common size for international publications. >=20 > You mean height =3D 11" =3D 792pt; width =3D 210mm =E2=89=88 595.276pt.= =20 You are correct with respect to "11 inches" (sorry, my mistake) -- but most of the pages of your document are in landscape mode. > I could. But some printers might try to mis-scale it, and in something > in which scale is important, why risk it? To the best of my knowledge the most important options for "Adobe Reader" (I can't comment on other PDF readers) are "don't scale" and "automatically center"; I'm aware that quite a lot of users don't care at all. Michael --=20 Real names enhance the probability of getting real answers. My e-mail account at DECUS Munich is no longer valid.