Date: Sat, 12 May 2012 10:00:26 +0200
From: Luuk <luuk@invalid.lan>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.php
Subject: Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP
References: <VCXpr.36118$Ec.5371@newsfe16.iad> <jo9ojv$orv$1@dont-email.me> <hy0qr.1437$HW6.1133@newsfe20.iad> <job33h$qi2$1@dont-email.me> <370jq7t07vrqpqn8l94rbpgcb4vmifma0q@mfesser.de> <jodqcr$u0s$1@dont-email.me> <sarlq7lavic2n0im3n074fklgfiphofape@mfesser.de> <RbCqr.748$9Q6.157@newsfe18.iad> <jofe40$iin$3@dont-email.me> <ilVqr.4488$iQ.1640@newsfe23.iad> <johaj8$c90$1@dont-email.me> <0rWqr.8806$br3.2203@newsfe10.iad> <johjbr$2qm$1@dont-email.me> <glopq7tv51j3blo0hr60h5gnb9h09vuvpd@mfesser.de> <joj2ih$pqq$6@news.albasani.net> <joj81g$6ik$1@dont-email.me> <jojngk$bjr$1@dont-email.me> <jojpbu$n7f$2@dont-email.me> <4a7089-sso.ln1@luuk.invalid.lan> <jok32k$hom$3@dont-email.me>
In-Reply-To: <jok32k$hom$3@dont-email.me>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <mth189-8q3.ln1@luuk.invalid.lan>
Lines: 48
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:980:9089:1:684e:d1ce:fbd0:7c00
X-Trace: 1336810201 news.xs4all.nl 6930 [2001:980:9089:1:684e:d1ce:fbd0:7c00]:33751
X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl
Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.stben.net!border3.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border1.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.php:5990

On 12-05-2012 00:15, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
> On 5/11/2012 3:53 PM, Luuk wrote:
>> On 11-05-2012 21:30, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>>> On 5/11/2012 2:58 PM, Shake wrote:
>>>> Jerry Stuckle a couché sur son écran :
>>>>>
>>>>> Loading the script, starting the scripting module, initializing the
>>>>> environment, interpreting and running the script, checking for the
>>>>> presence of the image, storing a resized script if necessary, loading
>>>>> the image and sending it, and cleaning up the environment.
>>>>>
>>>>> This vs. sending the image directly via an<img ...>  tag.
>>>>>
>>>>> Nope, no extra overhead! And no way to send the image without a
>>>>> script!
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The Extra overhead is something like in the code that generate the
>>>> page:
>>>>
>>>> <?php
>>>> if(!file_exists(IMG_PATH.$image_file)) scaleImage($image_file);
>>>> ?>
>>>>
>>>> Not look like an "application killer" to me.
>>>>
>>>> Greetings.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> There's a lot more to the overhead than that!
>>>
>>
>> only when file does not exists,
>> and, of course, the scaleImage wil make sure that it exists next time!
>> So, there will only be some overhead 1 time ....
>>
> 
> One time for each image, vs. 0 times for each image if they are resized
> offline in a batch script.
> 

So, offline is for 'free' ?
You are comparing apples with oranges here....

> That overhead x 7.5 million images the op indicates he has is significant.
>