Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Arno Welzel Newsgroups: comp.lang.php Subject: Re: Is it legitimate to have a continuous TABLE through multiple FORMs? Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 11:24:24 +0200 Lines: 41 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net 57LB/AxkOfr1RWVL5SRa3gan2jHzZwOvCaUH3aWTl4RiGhPuCO Cancel-Lock: sha1:9I2ps4ycxy/t4PRSr0IqfNWxZzo= In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.php:17901 On 26.04.19 11:20, Arno Welzel wrote: > On 26.04.19 11:09, R.Wieser wrote: > >> Arno, >> >>> So the a simplified example for the code fragment *could* >>> be like this: >>> [snip] >> >> Great ! You now have (at least) /two/ tables, which means that alignment >> wise they can, and most likely will, look quite different from each other. >> I guess you didn't think that far ? > > Yes I did. > >> And before you come up with the obvious "fix" for that: I hope you do >> realize that that will disable the tables own with recalculation (based on >> the contents) ? In short, now your "rules" are dictating what the >> webpage looks like - instead of helping with what the webpage designer wants >> to have. > > I am very well aware of it. My example was just to demonstrate, how > *valid* HTML would look like. And of course this may cause layout issues > which have to be fixed as well. > > Feel free to show a better solution using valid HTML code, I'm always > willing to learn from good examples. And no - valid HTML is not > "perfection" it's just the baseline from which a website has to start. And to avoid further meta discussions a bit of my background: -- Arno Welzel https://arnowelzel.de