Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!storethat.news.telefonica.de!feedme.news.telefonica.de!telefonica.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Chris Riesbeck <Chris.Riesbeck@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.php
Subject: Re: simpletest vs phpunit vs ...
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 14:08:52 -0600
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <aond6kFphqiU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <aogq26FaaoiU1@mid.individual.net> <kg5sft$tur$1@news.xmission.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net a9VMdFRiSwNLT+/HIq91dAM9HYcX/0FIDRmwlg7C19z9fQE8OSbrLHAX/6KUOGlHie
Cancel-Lock: sha1:II+BoHdWVvtd35azxiYFHuldTY0=
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130215 Thunderbird/17.0.3
In-Reply-To: <kg5sft$tur$1@news.xmission.com>
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.php:8421

On 2/21/2013 1:27 PM, Richard wrote:
> [Please do not mail me a copy of your followup]
>
> Simon <bad@example.com> spake the secret code
> <aogq26FaaoiU1@mid.individual.net> thusly:
>
>> Shall I bite the bullet now and move to phpunit or will simpletest still
>> be good enough for a long, long time?
>
> I've been using phpunit.  What I find lacking is a good mocking
> library, so I end up writing my own state-based fake objects that
> derive from my interface.  I'd really like to find something that is
> as expressive as jMock is for java mock objects, but so far I haven't
> found anything that seems to work that way.
>

I'm curious which specific aspects of jMock you most wanted that weren't 
in PHPunit's Mock objects

http://www.phpunit.de/manual/3.0/en/mock-objects.html