Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!news.swapon.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail From: "M. Strobel" Newsgroups: comp.lang.php Subject: Re: OOP versus Procedural/Functional Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 19:14:38 +0200 Lines: 31 Message-ID: <9uj83vFbd9U1@mid.uni-berlin.de> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de 9kxS2pAJo0Kmg3g59e2SoQnqlChtp42qsyv8IogNK+mOhK/RE= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; de; rv:1.9.2.28) Gecko/20120306 Thunderbird/3.1.20 In-Reply-To: Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.php:5431 Am 10.04.2012 17:07, schrieb Tim Streater: > In article , > The Natural Philosopher wrote: > >> Goran wrote: >> > On 9.4.2012 21:35, Mr. B-o-B wrote: >> >> I was curious about peoples thoughts in regards to OOP with PHP. >> >> >> >> Are there pro's/con's of writing OOP code versus procedural/functional >> >> coding? >> > > If you stick with procedural programming you will never get a decent job :D >> >> True. Its one of those fashions that everybody has to do, like wearing a suit at a >> bank used to be. >> >> No doubt it will pass in time. > > OO could be dangerous: > > > And Prolog is only good to find new aspects in your family - fathers, mothers, uncles, children. And Lisp is just the best choice to find the greatest common denominator. no links about that, my experience. I guess the list of irrelevant programming examples is ever growing, to infinity. /Str.