Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Arno Welzel Newsgroups: comp.lang.php Subject: Re: Automatically doing something if logged in Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 11:36:51 +0100 Lines: 35 Message-ID: <56CC3643.2010506@arnowelzel.de> References: <1b712b26-1665-45f9-9017-1dcf9e8bfbcb@googlegroups.com> <10712164.vGqmpjOXJh@PointedEars.de> <56CC0919.8030500@arnowelzel.de> <1500099.7AnM4ldetJ@PointedEars.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net is+LxA2p9W8AmaH2gpZhkAMdZxlSe8xiyACyv3nHkpqsigdj0G Cancel-Lock: sha1:hptCjnJVtPMKdgXIFgOUmf2L8W4= In-Reply-To: <1500099.7AnM4ldetJ@PointedEars.de> Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.php:16602 Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn schrieb am 2016-02-23 um 08:46: > Arno Welzel wrote: > >> Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn schrieb am 2016-02-22 um 22:25: >> [...] >>> Therefore, one should take into consideration that client-side support >>> for WebSocket is still experimental [1] (and had been disabled in Firefox >>> by default from version 4 to 23 inclusive [2]), and it might not be >>> feasible >> >> Yes, it is experimental. But at least since May 2014, when I created my >> WebSocket example at , all major >> browsers (Firefox, Chrome, Internet Explorer and even most mobile >> browsers) support it. >> >> Also see > > So it is not supported in Opera Mini 8 with a global market share of 4.79 %. > Users of browsers that someone did not define as “major” are not important > enough? I wouldn't call a browser which is used by less then 5% of all users a "major" browser. But since WebSockets and not supported *everywhere* I already agreed to you that I would use XHR instead if it is important that most people can use the application. -- Arno Welzel http://arnowelzel.de http://de-rec-fahrrad.de http://fahrradzukunft.de