Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Arno Welzel Newsgroups: comp.lang.php Subject: Re: parsing print_r() output with preg_match_all() Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 18:50:28 +0100 Lines: 53 Message-ID: <56968E64.10901@arnowelzel.de> References: <568d3dcf$0$23748$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl> <87r3huzevd.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <568d6f9c$0$23759$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl> <569363A3.6040108@arnowelzel.de> <5694313D.3060100@arnowelzel.de> <6929015.zlp62RpN2j@PointedEars.de> <569483AF.6010606@arnowelzel.de> <56956576.3040909@arnowelzel.de> <56956FF5.3050603@arnowelzel.de> <5695E316.9050809@arnowelzel.de> <569655E9.5000501@arnowelzel.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net Wq0z36wN0c8h1DDF4LZCGQ1gX62ByPkAL6JfKKyjV9b1maLDUu Cancel-Lock: sha1:poKoaT7yzLzMXw5ITu4DjGXkuzE= In-Reply-To: Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.php:16249 Jerry Stuckle schrieb am 2016-01-13 um 16:08: > On 1/13/2016 8:49 AM, Arno Welzel wrote: >> Jerry Stuckle schrieb am 2016-01-13 um 14:10: >> >>> On 1/13/2016 12:39 AM, Arno Welzel wrote: >> [..] >>>> It seems you really don't understand what I'm talking about. I mentioned >>>> JSON as a human readable standard instead of using var_dump() since >>>> var_dump() is not meant to be parsed. Then you said that I don't know >>>> what a standard is and that JSON is not "human readable". I even believe >>>> you don't know what "human readable" really means. Hint: the numbers >>>> above an GTIN-13 bar code are "human readable" even if you don't know >>>> what they mean - but at least you can read them in case the barcode >>>> reader does not work. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> Sure, I know what JSON is all about, troll. But no matter how you cut >> >> No, you don't. >> > > ROFLMAO! You keep making absurd claims about what I know and don't > know. None of them are true, and they only makes you look more stoopid > than ever. But that's just like a troll. And you? You don't make absurd claims about what I know? In fact you say that XML can be much "more" human readable that JSON - and this obviously shows that you don't know what you are talking about. >>> it, you can create XML much more human readable than JSON. But you've >>> never done anything with XML, so you have no idea what it's about. >> >> When talking about a "human readable" data format there is no a "more" >> or "less" - either something is readable for humans or not. As I said - >> you even don't know what "human readable" means - QED. >> > > And it shows you don't know anything about what's readable and what > isn't. Just because something is made up of ASCII characters does not > mean it's readable! Wrong - this *is* the meaning of "human readable" - in opposite to binary data which can only read by a machine. -- Arno Welzel http://arnowelzel.de http://de-rec-fahrrad.de http://fahrradzukunft.de