Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Arno Welzel Newsgroups: comp.lang.php Subject: Re: bug in is_numeric Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2013 17:02:48 +0200 Lines: 65 Message-ID: <51AF5318.5020901@arnowelzel.de> References: <5190d3a0$0$15991$e4fe514c@news2.news.xs4all.nl> <20Tlt.2628$cs.2574@newsfe03.iad> <0W1mt.2642$cs.21@newsfe03.iad> <51AA150A.5050401@arnowelzel.de> <51AF3C5C.60607@arnowelzel.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net y0YvBgCXqrorZx+ro0pNGQUsywA1oRSPeCm75OLj6HZGvp03Xl Cancel-Lock: sha1:8nzSZDxfQGwJWrlOqp1Tz415WDI= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6 In-Reply-To: Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.php:9768 Am 05.06.2013 16:34, schrieb Jerry Stuckle: > On 6/5/2013 9:25 AM, Arno Welzel wrote: >> Am 01.06.2013 20:54, schrieb Jerry Stuckle: >> >>> On 6/1/2013 11:36 AM, Arno Welzel wrote: >>>> Jerry Stuckle, 2013-05-21 12:03: >>>> >>>>> On 5/21/2013 1:54 AM, Sanders Kaufman wrote: >>>>>> "Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message news:knb6be$r05$3@dont-email.me... >>>>>> >>>>>>> I never claimed I was a victim. You're the only one who has brought >>>>>>> that subject up. >>>>>> >>>>>> Yeah, you did - when you said you didn't go along willingly, even though >>>>>> you were going along. >>>>>> That you pretended not to understand that isn't just an intellectual >>>>>> shortcoming; it's a character flaw. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Show me EXACTLY where I said "I didn't go along willingly". But you >>>>> can't. Trolls make all kinds of claims they can't substantiate. >>>> >>>> In you wrote: >>>> >>>> "No, I did not go along willingly with Pointed Head's hijacking of the >>>> thread." >>>> >>>> But you will tell us of course, that "I did not go along willingly" is >>>> something totally different to "I didn't go along willingly" ;-) >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> No, I didn't go along willingly with the hijacking. Completely >>> different than what you claimed. >> >> You wrote that you "did not go along willingly with the hijacking" - >> everybody can read this in your posting. On the other hand you say that >> you did NOT say "i did not go along willingly"... very confusing. >> > > Yep, meaning I did not support the hijacking of the thread. It did not > mean I was "dragged along" or was a "victim". Thanks for the explanation. > But then trolls always try to distort the truth. I just pointed out the single sentence "I did not go along willingly" and your claim that you never said this very sentence: "Show me EXACTLY where I said "I didn't go along willingly". But you can't." Yes - one can. You *did* write this sentence. Just be careful what you claim before you call everybody else a troll just because they do not agree. And even your understanding of the meaning of the word "troll" is questionable. -- Arno Welzel http://arnowelzel.de http://de-rec-fahrrad.de