Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!news.mixmin.net!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 21:53:13 +0200
From: Luuk <luuk@invalid.lan>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.php
Subject: Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP
References: <VCXpr.36118$Ec.5371@newsfe16.iad> <jo9ojv$orv$1@dont-email.me> <hy0qr.1437$HW6.1133@newsfe20.iad> <job33h$qi2$1@dont-email.me> <370jq7t07vrqpqn8l94rbpgcb4vmifma0q@mfesser.de> <jodqcr$u0s$1@dont-email.me> <sarlq7lavic2n0im3n074fklgfiphofape@mfesser.de> <RbCqr.748$9Q6.157@newsfe18.iad> <jofe40$iin$3@dont-email.me> <ilVqr.4488$iQ.1640@newsfe23.iad> <johaj8$c90$1@dont-email.me> <0rWqr.8806$br3.2203@newsfe10.iad> <johjbr$2qm$1@dont-email.me> <glopq7tv51j3blo0hr60h5gnb9h09vuvpd@mfesser.de> <joj2ih$pqq$6@news.albasani.net> <joj81g$6ik$1@dont-email.me> <jojngk$bjr$1@dont-email.me> <jojpbu$n7f$2@dont-email.me>
In-Reply-To: <jojpbu$n7f$2@dont-email.me>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <4a7089-sso.ln1@luuk.invalid.lan>
Lines: 33
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:980:9089:1:f477:37cb:2449:2d67
X-Trace: 1336766401 news.xs4all.nl 6918 [2001:980:9089:1:f477:37cb:2449:2d67]:60878
X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.php:5979

On 11-05-2012 21:30, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
> On 5/11/2012 2:58 PM, Shake wrote:
>> Jerry Stuckle a couché sur son écran :
>>>
>>> Loading the script, starting the scripting module, initializing the
>>> environment, interpreting and running the script, checking for the
>>> presence of the image, storing a resized script if necessary, loading
>>> the image and sending it, and cleaning up the environment.
>>>
>>> This vs. sending the image directly via an <img ...> tag.
>>>
>>> Nope, no extra overhead! And no way to send the image without a script!
>>>
>>
>> The Extra overhead is something like in the code that generate the page:
>>
>> <?php
>> if(!file_exists(IMG_PATH.$image_file)) scaleImage($image_file);
>> ?>
>>
>> Not look like an "application killer" to me.
>>
>> Greetings.
>>
>>
> 
> There's a lot more to the overhead than that!
> 

only when file does not exists,
and, of course, the scaleImage wil make sure that it exists next time!
So, there will only be some overhead 1 time ....