Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.php
Subject: Re: Apache and php to show http request headers.
Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2012 16:48:04 +0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 49
Message-ID: <4FEF11A4.4030004@arnowelzel.de>
References: <041d6312-2dee-4535-8215-6e9dbcb1e274@z19g2000vbe.googlegroups.com> <klslb9-ogk.ln1@luuk.invalid.lan> <js9phr$36a$1@softins.clara.co.uk> <js9pqt$1lm$1@dont-email.me> <js9tc0$5vn$1@softins.clara.co.uk> <js9tg1$pan$1@dont-email.me> <a4rgsaFj6nU1@mid.uni-berlin.de> <jsa4pd$8ij$1@dont-email.me> <a4rkp6FhomU1@mid.uni-berlin.de> <4FEA71B4.2090104@arnowelzel.de> <a4vti6F7k4U1@mid.uni-berlin.de> <jsheia$2jm$1@dont-email.me> <a55ljoFiegU1@mid.uni-berlin.de> <jsk7qg$tud$2@dont-email.me> <4FEED4E8.6010403@arnowelzel.de> <jsmq8d$bth$2@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="wnZIDGAKj5jYM76CtbPxGg"; logging-data="29588"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18XQsO3ZeTTr9QyBnF7kWMNGZW2CJyunxI="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120614 Thunderbird/13.0.1
In-Reply-To: <jsmq8d$bth$2@dont-email.me>
Cancel-Lock: sha1:hSF3DFOFzjZfuNs+3UL7bPiZO/Y=
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.php:6478

Jerry Stuckle, 30.06.2012 14:08:

> On 6/30/2012 6:28 AM, Arno Welzel wrote:
>> Jerry Stuckle, 29.06.2012 14:41:
>>
>>> On 6/29/2012 8:32 AM, M. Strobel wrote:
>>>> Am 28.06.2012 13:18, schrieb Arno Welzel:
>> [...]
>>>>> nginx has a market share of more than 11%:
>>>>>
>>>>> <http://w3techs.com/technologies/overview/web_server/all>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> My data is from 2010, so there is a big change. Interesting.
>>>>
>>>> When "(internal dummy connection)" started to show up in the apache
>>>> log files it was
>>>> quite clear to me the developers took a wrong turn. But this is
>>>> quite OT.
>>>>
>>>> /Str
>>>>
>>>
>>> Don't worry about it - the statistics are not accurate.  See how they
>>> were collected.  Not a scientific survey, at all.
>>
>> Feel free to point to a better survey.
>>
>>
> 
> Feel free to find your own survey.  Just because I point out the survey
> is completely inaccurate does not mean I need to find an accurate one.

In this case your statement is just meaningless.

> YOU want the valid statistics, so YOU go find them.  But before you do,
> you need to understand how VALID statistics are compiled and analyzed.
> 
> Now go crawl back in your little troll hole.

Same to you - thanks.


-- 
Arno Welzel
http://arnowelzel.de
http://de-rec-fahrrad.de