Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!xlned.com!feeder7.xlned.com!npeer.de.kpn-eurorings.net!npeer-ng0.de.kpn-eurorings.net!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool3.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Message-ID: <2563784.ZnRLnDoXCd@PointedEars.de> From: Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn Reply-To: Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn Organization: PointedEars Software (PES) Date: Sun, 02 Feb 2014 21:55:32 +0100 User-Agent: KNode/4.11.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Face: %i>XG-yXR'\"2P/C_aO%~;2o~?g0pPKmbOw^=NT`tprDEf++D.m7"}HW6.#=U:?2GGctkL,f89@H46O$ASoW&?s}.k+&. <1lge6zm.any5jv11w4szkN%adrian@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid> <1lgecvh.x0bk6rlzuxueN%adrian@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid> <52ed29c0$0$6654$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net> <1lgehed.jwy09vrrsa5yN%adrian@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid> MIME-Version: 1.0 Lines: 42 NNTP-Posting-Date: 02 Feb 2014 21:56:13 CET NNTP-Posting-Host: 10f1e38d.newsspool4.arcor-online.net X-Trace: DXC=GFhGLBZc>hOk:C4l9A;OcO4IUKEDZm8W4\YJNLYUVHKH;GI^G6_H3[V^<=UCM`Wlg=bhAdF X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.php:12745 Denis McMahon wrote: > On Sat, 01 Feb 2014 19:26:32 +0000, Denis McMahon wrote: >> On Sat, 01 Feb 2014 18:00:30 +0000, Adrian Tuddenham wrote: >>> I did not think I was outputting the variable to HTML, the handler for >>> that code is written in PHP (although it does generate some HTML, but >>> the problem occurs before that bit). >> >> Regardless of how the data gets there, you're placing the string >> contents of the variable concerned in the value attribute of an input >> element in an html document. > > Oh - check the view page source option in your web browser to see what > the web browser actually receives, or even use the w3c validator which > will highlight any errors and warnings for the html you are generating. > > w3c validator is at http://validator.w3.org/unicorn/ That is URI of the W3C *Unified* Validator which can be used if you want to check everything, HTML, CSS and so on at the same time (instead of using the W3C Markup Validator [1], and then the W3C CSS Validator at as well as other validation services). See for details. If one only wants to check the markup, one should use the W3C *Markup* Validator at [1] which is faster and more to the point than the Unified Validator because it only performs the markup checks that are relevant here. Likewise, if one only wants to check a stylesheet, or all the stylesheets used by a document, one should use the CSS Validator instead. PointedEars -- Use any version of Microsoft Frontpage to create your site. (This won't prevent people from viewing your source, but no one will want to steal it.) -- from (404-comp.)