Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.datemas.de!rt.uk.eu.org!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Rod Pemberton" Newsgroups: comp.lang.misc Subject: Re: Testers wanted! Date: Fri, 02 May 2014 21:02:39 -0400 Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Lines: 24 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: CNsg4fVcCsvs3UaOgZtQCw.user.speranza.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.16 (Linux) X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.misc:2148 On Fri, 02 May 2014 14:42:06 -0400, Nils M Holm wrote: > Nils M Holm wrote: >> ./scc0 -S *.c && tar cvfz scc0.tgz *.s && rm *.s >> ./scc1 -S *.c && tar cvfz scc1.tgz *.s && rm *.s > There is a difference in opt.s, scan.s, sym.s, misc.s, prep.s, and tree.s between scc0 and scc1. > Sorry! I meant: > >> ./scc -S *.c && tar cvfz scc2.tgz *.s && rm *.s >> ./scc1 -S *.c && tar cvfz scc1.tgz *.s && rm *.s > Are you sure? There is no difference between the assembly for the .s files between scc and scc1. I'll still send them, if you want them, and/or the others. Rod Pemberton