Path: csiph.com!news.nrbbs.org!border-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-4.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 01 Aug 2026 03:59:47 +0000 From: steve g Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp,comp.lang.c Subject: Re: Resources to learn common lisp? References: <110a9pp$ckmk$6@dont-email.me> <110es1g$1kk17$1@dont-email.me> <110fj4q$1r13s$5@dont-email.me> <110guci$26cjr$1@dont-email.me> <110i789$2iqm8$7@dont-email.me> <110j4qk$2q1p4$1@dont-email.me> <110l0v9$3av52$1@dont-email.me> <110nf0q$3vra6$3@dont-email.me> <87y0gg62cx.fsf@nightsong.com> <110rfqf$142ot$1@dont-email.me> <111ne5o$vsm3$3@dont-email.me> <111pbk6$36pi7$1@dont-email.me> <111sb7u$3ua8h$7@dont-email.me> <8fj54lpvg7v6mhi9r9u39tpojbjage8br4@4ax.com> <87mrwdyt0t.fsf@nightsong.com> <1127cho$34rpg$3@dont-email.me> <112o4aa$cpek$2@dont-email.me> <87jyqdtumj.fsf@gmail.com> <87bjbn2nhs.fsf@safunu.org> Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2026 23:59:43 -0400 Message-ID: <877bmaqymo.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cancel-Lock: sha1:OePEhLsl/NQLtfMDmZs+iHrgCpU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Lines: 25 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com X-Trace: sv3-MYefX9h/VFnd8ItXgIBg2hQibLYJO9BlCEiFJlZBIg71x8vLgNbUr6mEbdlbjn+RYpY7GCC8JEbomCe!OFXg1EaIcl2fpWccgj3UEQXmO+ranBu+MjH5UjmnibbMkXw= X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.lisp:61258 comp.lang.c:400683 Anton Antimo writes: > Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson writes: > > [...] > >>>> Sadly we've also ended up with programmers who think the machines >>>> they program for are giant PDP-11s, and as a result machines which >>>> spend a huge amount of effort pretending to be giant PDP-11s. >>>> >>>> It's all a tragedy. >> >> The tragedy is not using Common Lisp for everything. > > I loved this bit and I have a feeling you're correct. My little > experience with Common Lisp is that it allows me to write the equivalent > fast code that I'd write in C, where speed matters. In other words, I > seem to gain nothing (other than more work) by writing typical > applications in C. Wait until you read LISP:Lisp In Small Pieces. it's published in france.