Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: John Harris Newsgroups: comp.lang.javascript Subject: Re: Can someone tell if this is javascript or else (jquery)? Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 16:09:01 +0000 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 23 Message-ID: References: <89e24913-7873-405c-9b54-9c35331c4d15@googlegroups.com> <1998996.AYlFq7fMdc@PointedEars.de> <1927932.lV8zrDp9mk@PointedEars.de> <7b17cbplm9lhdtdklbg8tfemji6qvvjnkn@4ax.com> <1864172.qbm0T80u8X@PointedEars.de> Reply-To: jgharris@ic4life.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="21ad42a9e7ffec65f0c6a3171a433434"; logging-data="27963"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18iMtKJYNuHDCGdXSLin5AYE9YYcqWnp0k=" User-Agent: ForteAgent/7.20.32.1218 Cancel-Lock: sha1:+jZqRS9iChUrRzFQfqq9Wv0X47A= Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.javascript:29628 On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 15:57:51 +0100, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: >The record shows that =93javascript=94 is a=20 >misnomer that frequently leads to misunderstandings This shows that Thomas is totally incapable of thinking straight on this subject.=20 a) If it's a misnomer then it's correct to say javascript does not exist. It's still not correct to say it in an unpleasant way. b) If it leads to misunderstanding then it's correct to clear up the misunderstanding. It's not correct to say the thing misunderstood does not exist. It's also impolite to assume that someone has misunderstood with no factual evidence. Calling everyone a troll who doesn't agree with you is another cheap debating trick. John