Path: csiph.com!aioe.org!.POSTED.wIgm+2MIUUYkuZKIR0Uhug.user.gioia.aioe.org!not-for-mail
From: "R.Wieser"
Newsgroups: comp.lang.javascript
Subject: Re: Objects what are they.
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 19:42:27 +0200
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Lines: 36
Message-ID:
References: <8e03edae-dc71-4a28-9b80-579934821794@googlegroups.com> <1e0e684f-a0c8-40d9-b43d-9129a7d4b99d@googlegroups.com> <962aa60c-b156-4784-9baf-3c62798d5e81@googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: wIgm+2MIUUYkuZKIR0Uhug.user.gioia.aioe.org
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5512
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5512
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.javascript:36485
Julio,
>> > The answer was given already: one gets a *reference* to an object.
>>
>> To use your own words "*That* is an implementation detail". :-p
>
> No, that isn't, you utter moron.
Lolz^2
Remember this one (Sat, 27 Apr 2019 10:19:23 -0700 (PDT ):
>> It does that in the same way a string or an array can be returned: By
>> returning a *pointer* to it.
>
> *That* is an implementation detail, you other resident fucking troll.
I can be wrong, but it looks to me you just turned around as a leaf in the
wind, just to be able to sprout another "Youre WRONG!" blurbs.
Kiddo, you are either really bad at trolling, or just a moron.
> *Plonk*
Lolz! Thats what I call a win-win situation for me: either I do have to
read another of your junk, or you prove that your word isn't worth shite ...
Regards,
Rudy Wieser
P.s.
Don't think I did not notice that you haven't come up with anything
supporting your "facts" in this post either - even though I explicitily
asked for them. That does tell whole chapters you know. :-)