Path: csiph.com!aioe.org!.POSTED.wIgm+2MIUUYkuZKIR0Uhug.user.gioia.aioe.org!not-for-mail From: "R.Wieser" Newsgroups: comp.lang.javascript Subject: Re: Objects what are they. Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 18:31:58 +0200 Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Lines: 47 Message-ID: References: <8e03edae-dc71-4a28-9b80-579934821794@googlegroups.com> <1e0e684f-a0c8-40d9-b43d-9129a7d4b99d@googlegroups.com> <962aa60c-b156-4784-9baf-3c62798d5e81@googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: wIgm+2MIUUYkuZKIR0Uhug.user.gioia.aioe.org X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5512 X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Priority: 3 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5512 Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.javascript:36481 Julio, > The answer was given already: one gets a *reference* to an object. To use your own words "*That* is an implementation detail". :-p But, in one message you: - do exactly what you accuse others of (talking about "implementation detail") - replacing one word for a similar one and crow victory. - not giving the OP anything better than that he's already got. :-( Kiddo, I would like to believe you're just doing exactly what you accuse me of doing (trolling), but looking at the above I don't think you've got the smarts for that. :-) > And this is not even the first time this comes up, which is > the reason why I call you a troll, Lolz. Kiddo, we've crossed paths three times in the last 5 months, and none of the subjects where about anything comparable. But be my guest and quote what you are referring to there (I won't hold my breath though). As for you calling me a troll ? You can call me anything you want. But as long as I do not see anything from you that supports your accusations I will just ignore it. > It's your spouting bullshit that is helping nobody... troll. :-) You know whats funny about that ? Yesterday I got a "thank you" from groovee for trying to explain that stuff to him. But if you think its all "bullshit" you are (again, second time) free to come up with something better. I'm actually looking forward to it. You see, I'm convinced that there is a *lot* that I do not know, and you could be telling me new stuff. But there is one thing I do not do: accept someones claims of things being this-or-that "because I say so". You have to have present proof, or at least supporting arguments for it. So, are you up to it ? Regards, Rudy Wieser