Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: $Bill <news@todbe.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.javascript
Subject: Re: How to write object-oriented JS function?
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2016 00:46:21 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 24
Message-ID: <nsvmo2$77a$1@dont-email.me>
References: <78daa021-c64d-4017-b761-17ea13fdcaee@googlegroups.com> <44hvub55bdcc6ca2lcivhfu3qs1ss39b1g@4ax.com> <1dee4fbb-163e-40d4-b901-9dedeacc3e92@googlegroups.com> <b6o1vbd9kulajd8ou11eoegdtnrdrg0jmr@4ax.com> <097196c0-218d-4cce-8eb7-13e47fac5468@googlegroups.com> <6194vb178d81b2mrgg8viikpgoqusvv9il@4ax.com> <9n94vbd04gmdirnh7chp9jeqo6kp5i3n75@4ax.com> <XnsA6967A44DCB22eejj99@194.109.6.166> <8i75vbd14a0cooqv29uu5uobl0tv8vvhgs@4ax.com> <XnsA696F1C4E40F3eejj99@194.109.6.166> <nsulmk$ufa$1@dont-email.me> <nsum2m$ufa$2@dont-email.me> <XnsA6975E517EC5Eeejj99@194.109.6.166>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2016 07:46:10 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="eb0a2afd2d39dcaa817ad5aefda0318f"; logging-data="7402"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18dyLuNEPDGnPuRvZUjIQjE2d8FPWxPRIk="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0
In-Reply-To: <XnsA6975E517EC5Eeejj99@194.109.6.166>
Cancel-Lock: sha1:ryZxPyjTilwoNXxeGWXMYp7Y81o=
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.javascript:31506

On 10-04-16 00:16, Evertjan. wrote:
> $Bill <news@todbe.com> wrote on 04 Oct 2016 in comp.lang.javascript:
>
>> On 10-03-16 15:22, $Bill wrote:
>>> On 10-03-16 14:46, Evertjan. wrote:
> [..]
>>>> Same problem:
>>>>
>>>> jag.cnt = 1;
>>>> if (jag.cnt == 20)
>>>>
>>>> Seems to me NOW the if-condition is NEVER true.
>>>
>>> Unless there's an increment of jag.cnt like below.
>>
>> PS: And the two stmts aren't literally following each other as shown.
>
> Ah yes: "Unless the code is different".
>
> In another field, that is called "apologetics" ;-)

No, it's called clarification of an assumption I made.  I don't believe
for a second that those two stmts literally follow each other in the
actual code, but you can never be sure can you.