Path: csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!news.solani.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Christoph M. Becker" Newsgroups: comp.lang.javascript Subject: Re: Impact of implicit arrays... Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 00:10:52 +0200 Organization: solani.org Lines: 15 Message-ID: References: <4a1c28ea-447b-4e9b-9c75-68ef85c379e7@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: solani.org 1466547048 7582 eJwNyccBwDAIBLCVKD7KOBjM/iMk+gpqbO3HYAeLrbxFdbkX46wFzAbqkXIefSbPXEI6yxB6mdEkKhdhuQM/KtyXLMbpr8mYQq/0s0ja+QCG2x3x (21 Jun 2016 22:10:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@news.solani.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 22:10:48 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.1 X-User-ID: eJwNx8EBwEAEBMCWbo8VykHov4RkfkMxWD9qNOVyQ4DizLklki8KaxM9Vc32MvjlX4dGHs37ASVUEVE= In-Reply-To: Cancel-Lock: sha1:xBmB22998azOcKazsUexuJj+08U= X-NNTP-Posting-Host: eJwVzMkRACAIBMGU5FiEcAAl/xAsaz79GoiR9VaDKeZHmlHXlTQKn7Ym9SBuBDYntrMdLvFuNsZNKhRDr/0RIVhE2iP0TAc3t48urLHc+QB8Zh2w Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.javascript:30702 On 21.06.2016 at 23:43, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: > Humm... FWIW, for some reason I also really like the simple array based > method I am using now. > > Yours is easier to read, but for me using foo[0] for x, foo[1] for y, > ect looks more matrix like wrt indexing into an array; its not all that > bad to my eyes. Also, it makes iterating over the elements really > intuitive. Then you might be interested in typed arrays, see, for instance, . -- Christoph M. Becker