Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Aleksandro <aleksandro@gmx.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.javascript
Subject: Re: convert a string into a json object,
Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2016 21:01:28 -0300
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 34
Message-ID: <ndpmal$2pr$1@dont-email.me>
References: <c8134afb-b7f5-4e2d-b3e6-90f8a3594544@googlegroups.com> <json-20160401033220@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <ndlcms$ae5$1@news.albasani.net> <style-20160401174212@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <i0ftfbt8uvgeeg9nsn9hqk8496tmn647pp@4ax.com> <87d1q9qfyr.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <2542125.XVB1Yskezl@PointedEars.de> <ndon26$gbn$1@dont-email.me> <1630971.JlSNffjCh4@PointedEars.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2016 23:58:13 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="7363fa7664fe264696fafdff2cecae6a"; logging-data="2875"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+x07fk7L+w8e+Eg8JOlC+2v2zu0cig+24="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.1
In-Reply-To: <1630971.JlSNffjCh4@PointedEars.de>
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Rr6OH21bF8Tz30e1xO0Ho28hMmE=
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.javascript:30196

On 02/04/16 12:36, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
> Aleksandro wrote:
> 
>> On 01/04/16 23:07, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
>>> Ben Bacarisse wrote:
>>>> John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> writes:
>>>>> The code contained
>>>>>   const result = {};
>>>>> and
>>>>>   result[i]= person;
>>>>>
>>>>> The constant  result  is not what I would call a constant. You've
>>>>> updated it.
>>>> const makes the binding immutable, the object isn't.
>>> Neither is the value as it is updated on each iteration.  This code
>>> should break; ECMAScript got it wrong.
>>>
>>> Rule of thumb of good programming: Do not write code in a way that is
>>> harder to understand.
>>
>> I don't think we will change our way to code because you don't understand.
>                 ^^
> You must be referring to yourself and the voices in that troll head of 
> yours.
> 
> Straw man.  I am *obviously* not the only one who thinks that this code is 
> written in a counter-intuitive way, and should therefore be written 
> differently.

Someone else agreeing with you doesn't make you automatically right.
Calling a troll someone who doesn't agree with you neither does.

By the way, since you ignored my question last time, I ask again: why
did you “unplonk” me? ;)